Ok, prolly a stupid question, but why does de DK-2 has got bindings as an import where the rest don't? (like my KE-3 for instance)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
bindings
Collapse
X
-
Re: bindings
[img]graemlins/stupid.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/fart.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/thebirds.gif[/img]
just kidding [img]graemlins/toast.gif[/img] was wondering because I know the dk2 had 'em and the older import kellys as well, but not my ke-3... [img]graemlins/band.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Comment
-
Re: bindings
If you look at the history of Jackson, you'll find that binding was traditionaly used on the soloist - style guitars pretty much most of the time.. Jackson was one of the first, if not the first to offer a Strat-shaped guitar with a bound neck and headstock.. something usually seen only on Gibsons and Deans at the time.
The Dinky is a child of the soloist, a cheaper, version basically, hence the binding.. the only way to get binding on a non-strat shape guitar is to get it from the custom shop.
Oh, and some RR models have binding..
Now go ahead and point out how many models I left out. [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Comment
-
Re: bindings
Just to add, some Kelly had a bound neck too, I know.. yadda yadda.
I still think, that the bound neck was a way of making a visual statement for Jackson.
I remember, when I was a teen, I played the original Charvels and Kramers.. but what me and my buddies wanted was one of them fancy, pro guitars,.. Y'know, the Jacksons.
We knew they were for real PRO'S 'cause they had bound necks.. [img]graemlins/poke.gif[/img]
Comment
Comment