Re: Were the Jackson Professionals in the 90\'s goo
[ QUOTE ]
The body is a Dinky EX and the neck is a Dinky Reverse. Unless you're looking for parts, I'd steer clear of this one. The neck and body are incompatable, the neck on the Dinky EX was 22 frets whereas the Dinky Reverse is 24. This guitar will never intonate correctly.
[/ QUOTE ]
The pup spacing and bridge placement look right for a 24 fret neck on the guitar pictured above. Here's a link to a Dinky EX. Compare the distance between the pups and how far back the trem is on the body compared to the one above. Could the guitar in question above, possibly be a Fusion EX body with a hum in the neck?
http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-JACKSON-Dinky-E...1QQcmdZViewItem
[ QUOTE ]
The body is a Dinky EX and the neck is a Dinky Reverse. Unless you're looking for parts, I'd steer clear of this one. The neck and body are incompatable, the neck on the Dinky EX was 22 frets whereas the Dinky Reverse is 24. This guitar will never intonate correctly.
[/ QUOTE ]
The pup spacing and bridge placement look right for a 24 fret neck on the guitar pictured above. Here's a link to a Dinky EX. Compare the distance between the pups and how far back the trem is on the body compared to the one above. Could the guitar in question above, possibly be a Fusion EX body with a hum in the neck?
http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-JACKSON-Dinky-E...1QQcmdZViewItem
Comment