Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

jackson necks : is it my impression

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jackson necks : is it my impression

    so :
    is it only my impression ( i played tested those guitars but not one after other ) :

    is there a difference between those necks :

    sl3 soloist neck : is like thinner more ibanez style

    dxmg : medium width

    rr5 : wide and extremely comfortable [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

    i'm asking because basically want a superstrat with a floyd but with an rr neck [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
    is it possible . aa and neck through of course [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

    Was is only my impression caused with the long time pause between testing those models ?

    btw is the kv4 a new model ? because it has it all : floyd , neck through [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

    peace and thanx for ya help

  • #2
    Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

    The KV4 model has been discontinued a few years ago.
    http://www.myspace.com/officialuncreation

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

      the DXMG is the thinnest jackson neck ive ever played.

      ~eric

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

        Originally posted by illumina:
        the DXMG is the thinnest jackson neck ive ever played.

        ~eric
        <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Now i am truely
        [img]graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img]
        I thought the DXMG as it says on the jackson site is thicker than the DK-2 and SL's?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

          ok so finnally is that what i've said true ?

          because : no shop in my country has so much jacksons [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] .

          basically is the sl3 neck thinner or thicker than the dxmg's ? and is it thinner or thicker than the rr5 rhoads neck ?.

          it would be very helpful for me [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

            Isn't this what you can find as "neck dimensions" in the model specs at www.jacksonguitars.com?

            'bane

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

              The Dinky (bolt-on) necks should all be about the same: thin, but not as thin as an Ibanez Wizard neck. I believe the Stealth necks were actually thinner and closer to the Wizards. The Soloist (neck-thru) should be a little thicker, especially the USA ones, but the speed necks I believe are thicker at the lower frets and get thinner higher up the neck.
              I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

                I've played both an SL3 and an RR5 pretty recently, and I found their necks to be almost identical. I wonder if the Japanese factory was using the same neck blanks for the RR5 and SL4 while the latter was still in production?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: jackson necks : is it my impression

                  Originally posted by illumina:
                  the DXMG is the thinnest jackson neck ive ever played.

                  ~eric
                  <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">it's not the thinest thats for sure but it is pretty nice , the thinest Jackson necks I've ever played were the imports from the 94/95 catalog stuff , those necks were bloody thin and played like a dream ! light years thiner from the neck thru USA stuff of today or then ! //Steve

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X