Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

    the DKMG goes for quite a bit more money than the DK 2's, is it a better built guitar or the same thing only with the EMGhz's with booster and small fin inlays?





    [ November 18, 2003, 11:38 AM: Message edited by: randyvanmalmsteen ]

  • #2
    Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

    ^What does arched top mean?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

      The top of the guitar is not flat. It has a slight arch to it..like a lespaul for example, the top is not flat, like a soloist. Instead it has a "arch top"...maybe soemoen can explain it better than that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

        + arched top and rev headstock.
        I'm guessing the overall quality would be about the same if you disregard the pickups/preamp.

        [ November 18, 2003, 12:54 PM: Message edited by: Sunbane ]

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

          Originally posted by GWARGHOUL:
          The top of the guitar is not flat. It has a slight arch to it..like a lespaul for example, the top is not flat, like a soloist. Instead it has a "arch top"...maybe soemoen can explain it better than that.
          <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">that was pretty good of a explaination [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
          some swear that the arch tops have a thicker tone?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

            Ok [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

              some swear that the arch tops have a thicker tone?
              <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I wouldn't swear to anything of that sort, but I do prefer the feel of an archtop. Of my Jacksons, my archtop pro's are my favorite hands down. It sort of feels like a more comfortable and sleek Les Paul, I guess.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

                They say that the archtop gets more tone due to the surfance area.

                To give you an idea.

                ----------------

                That is a regular guitar

                ---------
                --- ---
                ---- ----
                that is an arched top...there is more surface area.


                Theoretically for the most surface tone you could get, you would want it to go like


                ---- ------- ----
                --------- --------

                So the sound would go up the sides, and back down.

                Some bullshiot my physics teacher told me in school, prolly all bunk tho.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: better built overall, the DKMG or DK 2?

                  the arch top would have a thicker section in the middle of the body,so who knows [img]graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img]

                  [ November 21, 2003, 11:28 AM: Message edited by: randyvanmalmsteen ]

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X