Hey guys... What Rhoads model had offset dots, HSS, and floyd? Might be neck thru as well, from what the guy says. Two pots (volume and tone presumably) and a 5 way. Any help appreciated. Did a search but didn't come up with anything really useful.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rhoads ID?
Collapse
X
-
you reckon that's ebony? Could be dark rosewood. That body looks a bit hinky to me too. Someone decided they'd rather a rear-loaded H-S-S setup, so they've made their own body, bolted up a Jackson neck and refinned in matte black. I wouldn't buy it without better pics and preferably after having had a personal inspection.Hail yesterday
Comment
-
it does look good, but the rosewood on my Fusion Plus (also with offset dots) is just as dark. So is the board on my Model 2. I can't make out the grain, but that might be my monitor, the quality of the pics, whatever
what do you think of the shape of the body? Something seems off about it to me.Hail yesterday
Comment
-
Originally posted by RacerXWeird features. Ad says set neck but I doubt that. Offset dot inlays on ebony? If that's a real Jackson it seems like a custom shop.
It does look weird, but if it was a bolt on neck, where are the neck screws and plate. That one picture shows the back but I don't see a neck plate.Guitars:
Charvel: USA Pro Mod Slime Green
1988 Model 2,
Jackson: Dinky HSS 'Blue/Orange Flame'
RR3
Gibson: 1978 Les Paul Spl Dbl Cut
1992 LP Studio 'Lite'
2005 SG Special
Comment
-
the seller has added new pics. Now we can see that the f/b is clearly rosewood. And it does appear to be neckthru, with a clear finished neck.
The body still looks whack. And the routs on the back look wrong to me too.
It's possible that someone glued a Jackson neck into a homemade body (effectively making it setneck) and then shaped the body to suit. A much closer inspection (preferably hands on) would be required to allow me to buy that guitar with any confidence.Hail yesterday
Comment
-
While I've seen a H-S-S Rhoads somewhere before, it was not a Jackson. This thing screams "fake!!!!!" to me...although it could be a heavilly modded parts mutt. I agree with Vit G that the back routes look wrong. The rear strap pin is also in the wrong location. The control layout also doesn't match any Jackson-made Rhoads I've ever seen. The only things looking legit on that thing are the neck, and maybe the trem (and both look like they came off low-end models).
Avoid. Definitely avoid.
Comment
-
The trem routing is set so far back it looks like the body is very thin and could crack inhalf. I would be scared the scale was wrong and the guitar can't be intonated properly. their alot better deals out there then $400 for that guitar. I just paid $500 for a RR5 on ebay.
Comment
Comment