If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I helped a guy order a Jackson Stars from a shop in Japan, and when we were going through the itemized bill, I noticed that the shop had charged almost twice the actual shipping fee. I'm guessing that maybe that's one way they make it "worth the hassle" for an international sale...
Henrik-
Well... Uh... You know, I was letting the neck settle with its added tension, because I had tuned the guitar up a whole step...
Yeah, that's the ticket
Last edited by QuantumRider; 10-25-2006, 09:55 AM.
Until you get weaned off the boobie, you are going to have to do what the wife wants too. -Rsmacker
I helped a guy order a Jackson Stars from a shop in Japan, and when we were going through the itemized bill, I noticed that the shop had charged almost twice the actual shipping fee. I'm guessing that maybe that's one way they make it "worth the hassle" for an international sale...
Wow, that flamed Jackson Stars is gorgeous. Looks top quality. I bought several set-neck ESP customer Explorers from Japan. I usually got charged like $125 for shipping, but recently a shop tried to charge me $200.
Very cool guitar, Atsushi!
I think the most important thing is that it has binding... rosewood board and pearloid inlays are ok for a "budget" guitar in my book, but binding really makes a difference (see SL3 for comparison).
BTW I paid around 120 EUR for shipping of my Jackson Stars Rhoads, which also has very beautiful MOP inlays and logo!
See thread here:
$200 is fairly excessive, if the guitar is being shipped to the US from Japan. $125 sounds about right, depending on the size and weight of the hard case that the guitar is shipped in.
Shadowcat-
Street price for an SL3 is just about $1000 (at least here in Japan)...
You must make a lot more money than I do, if you can call that a "budget" guitar
Glad to hear you're still digging your Trans Green RR
Until you get weaned off the boobie, you are going to have to do what the wife wants too. -Rsmacker
uh, you are right... now my post doesn't even make sense to myself anymore.
I guess what I wanted to say is:
The Grover Jackson and the SL3 are downgraded compared to a J1 Soloist or a USA SL1... but the Grover Jackson looks alot better because of the binding.
Very cool guitar, Atsushi!
I think the most important thing is that it has binding... rosewood board and pearloid inlays are ok for a "budget" guitar in my book, but binding really makes a difference (see SL3 for comparison).
I guess what I wanted to say is:
The Grover Jackson and the SL3 are downgraded compared to a J1 Soloist or a USA SL1... but the Grover Jackson looks alot better because of the binding.
Actually, Grover Jackson was the brand name that Chushin-Gakki used before adopting the name Jackson Stars. So it's not necessarily a "downgraded" model. With the rosewood board, though, I'm going to assume that it's equivalent to Jackson Stars' present J2 line.
That depends on how much disposable income you've got, doesn' it?
I would consider $200 or less as good deal on a decent guitar. A lot of used Charvel Model series pop up in the $200-$400 range here, and sometimes you can find them even cheaper
Until you get weaned off the boobie, you are going to have to do what the wife wants too. -Rsmacker
Comment