Originally posted by charvel750
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Archtop Professional?
Collapse
X
-
-
Yes, precisely it's a Brazilian rosewood board which is very similar to pau ferro wood in appearance. Brazil has the most uncommonly good rosewood in the world. Except for Jackson Custom Shop guitars, the LTD '91 was the only Brazilian rosewood fingerboard in production. But nothing beats the quality of the tops on those '91 LTD's. Almost every Soloist Pro I've seen (about 30) have decent tops, but not the kind that blow you over and knock your socks off!"Got a crazy feeling I don't understand,
Gotta get away from here.
Feelin' like I shoulda kept my feet on the ground
Waitin' for the sun to appear..."
Comment
-
Originally posted by charvel750 View PostHow is that more ultimate than the LTD '91 AT Pro? No abalone, no gold, no Reflex, no quilt top, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daywalker View PostHow much are you willing to spend :-) ?
This is mine:
(it has a seymour duncan JB in it now but i have the original Jackson p'up)
Sorry , that isn't an archtop professional. Be careful with your postings. It almost sounds like you are trying to spam, which is a violation of forum rules. Once you meet forum requirements, and are given access to the Classified forum, you can post it for sale in there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DonP View Post:ROTF:
Sorry , that isn't an archtop professional. Be careful with your postings. It almost sounds like you are trying to spam, which is a violation of forum rules. Once you meet forum requirements, and are given access to the Classified forum, you can post it for sale in there.
I have respected the rules of this board from the beginning and even tho i'd love to have the post-100-post priviledges - i refuse to fill this board with benign drivel to make up my post count like some newbies do.
This guitar is 1992 Dinky AR (archtop) Professional (MIJ).
I'm not an expert on guitars so apologies if it is not the type of "archtop professional" you guys are talking about it.
Geesh - when did the reception here get so frosty.... :-(
Comment
-
Originally posted by emperor_black View Postso, here is a Newbie question, does the SLSMG have a "Archtop" body type?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sunbane View PostYes, at least according to Jackson; MG Series SLSMG Super Lightweight Soloist™ : Mahogany carved-top body, mahogany neck (through body), compound radius ebony fingerboard", etc...
Don't worry i don't embarass easily ;-)
I'm fairly certain its a 92 Dinky AR Pro, as i have seen it in the 92 catalog. what are you guys talking about...and maybe i can learn something
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daywalker View PostDo you fancy telling me where i went so wrong with thinking my guitar was an "archtop professional"?
Don't worry i don't embarass easily ;-)
I'm fairly certain its a 92 Dinky AR Pro, as i have seen it in the 92 catalog. what are you guys talking about...and maybe i can learn something
Comment
-
Or to be more precise; They're talking about the Soloist Archtop Pro...commonly referred to on this board as "Archtop Pro", or just "AT Pro". This construction was a set neck, 24.75" scale guitar with all the trimmings (bound neck, ebony fretboard, etc). And in my opinion, it should have been named SLAT Pro, because that's what it is.
Daywalker, I do agree with you that your guitar is also an "Archtop Professional". There's absolutely nothing wrong in that statement. It is inarguably a guitar from the Professional series, and it does have an archtop. Incidentally, both those characteristics also match the Soloist Archtop Pro. The people discussing the Soloist should have learnt to distinguish between "Pro" and "Professional". This is known here as "Proconfusion".
Comment
-
Originally posted by shadowcat View PostI own a cherry sunburst string-thru Archtop Pro. Mine has a thin flat neck.
BTW, there are 750s with both recessed and non-recessed trems out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Genebaby View PostSome 750's have a cutout behind the trem, but they are still not recessed. Neck angle is the same as 750's without the cutout. Just a variation in the model over it's production run.
As far as I know, the early ones had the pull-up route, small bevels for the cutaways, and semi-recessed knobs. On the later ones, they ditched the pull-up route, made the bevels bigger and recessed the knobs further into the top. However, I'm not sure all those changes took place all at once, or if they were introduced one by one, over time.
Comment
Comment