Tweet
I've been looking at what GC has in their used section and I found some model of an RR, but it has no pickguard and a deep dish. I've never seen one like this before. Any idea what it is?
-
-
The shape of that body doesn't look quite right. Looks like a fake. -
Looks like an RX10D that someone modded. I think they go for around $450 new.Comment
-
Oh.. gawd.. I hate the chrome..
Not knowing Jackson's that well. What looks different?2009 Les Paul Kit - GFS Dream 90 (N), SD Seth Lover (B)
2009 Gibson Les Paul Worn Brown
2009 Epiphone Studio Deluxe
2008 Epiphone Custom - SD P-Rail(N), Fat Pat (B)
2008 Ovation Celebrity CC48
2007 Agile AL3000 - SD Alinco II set
2005 Epiphone Standard - SD Pearly Gate (N),SD Alinco II (B)
2004 Epiphone Custom Plus Top
2004 Gibson SG Faded - Stock
1997 Epiphone Slash Snakepit
1995 Fender Strat - SD Lil 59' Bridge, SD Hotrail Middle, Stock Neck
Comment
-
-input jack (looks terrible)
-logo placement on headstock looks off
I bet this is one of those Chinese cheapies
"Quiet, numbskulls, I'm broadcasting!" -Moe Howard, "Micro-Phonies" (1945)Comment
-
Yeah that input jack location reeks of gheyness_________________________________________________
"Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
- Ken MComment
-
That's what I think. Looks like you can still see the plate from the old jack on the bottom of the body.Originally posted by z1n View PostI feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.Comment
-
Originally posted by Axewielder View Post
Agreed. An angled cable would've fixed any concerns about the original jack placement.My future band shall be known as "One Samich Short Of A Picnic"!Comment
-
I think Ron is right. The logo and headstock seem wrong..
Whatever it is, I'd stay away from it."I hate these filthy neutrals! With enemies, you know where they stand. But with neutrals... who knows? It sickens me!"Comment
-
I have one that's identical apart from the fuckd up jack socket. Someone on here Id'd it as a possible early RX10D. Pups are crap but it plays well.Comment
-
My money is on home made hack job. It's funny that he didn't put the jack plate on the rear cover.Comment
-
I also think the bridge looks off as it looks like an ofr if it were an RX10D it would have angles missing in the trem route from the original trem unless it's a really old RX 10 with the jt500 did this have straight baseplates like the Schaller or ofr???
Some more detailed pics would be nice especially of the trem, jack/original jack location, and headstock...Comment
-
I can't get any better pics, thats just off of guitar center's website.
I'm not thinking of buying it for myself, I just thought it seemed peculiar and wondered what it was. The fact that you guys can ID these like this is flabbergasting!Comment
-
The trem still doesent seem right it looks like floyd II/schalelr style but it wouldnt be a jt590 on this model not without there being spac in teh cavity culd be a fakeComment
-
> My money is on home made hack job.
+1"It wasn't the world being round that agitated people, but that the world wasn't flat. [ ... ]
The truth will seem utterly preposterous, and its speaker, a raving lunatic."Comment
Comment