Originally posted by soc_monki
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jackson DK2M problems
Collapse
X
-
ok, I took some shots of the Dk2m...
This shot shows the imperfect neck pocket. One side is longer than the other. Which inturn theoretically would mean the neck is tilted more on one side than the other. BTW, my DK2T also has this "imperfection" but plays like a dream.
however, this shot with the camera sitting on the body shows that the neck is perfectly flat with respect to the body.
Like I mentioned before, the difference between the high and low sides was if a dunlop Jazz III pick which is 1.38 mm thick can slide easily under one side of the fretboard overhang than the other.Sam
Comment
-
That's not an "imperfect" neck pocket. It is a contoured heel and is supposed to be that way. Just like these Warmoth guitar bodies:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Surfgreen View PostThat's not an "imperfect" neck pocket. It is a contoured heel and is supposed to be that way.
Originally posted by emperor_blackhowever, this shot with the camera sitting on the body shows that the neck is perfectly flat with respect to the body.
Comment
-
Those pics show nothing wrong with the guitar. I think he may have misunderstood the problem I had with mine about the high E side sitting up. It didn't have anything to do with the contoured heel. I wish I would have saved those pics. I could have probably slid about 3-4 dunlop jazz picks under the space mine was sitting up, it was pretty bad.
Comment
-
On the Dinky, the fretboard extends out past the neck by a half inch or so. If this half inch of fretboard is warped, then one side could be closer to the body than the other side. Or in the case of what most seem to be witnessing, the high E side is higher than the low E side. Well, this could be one possibility. Or, it could be a worse scenario with the neck is not seated properly in neck pocket causing one side to stand up higher. In any event, as with anything that is engineered or designed, there are tolerances and the measurements are either within tolerance or they are not. It is QC's job to determine this.
Comment
-
I don't understand why Jackson isn't doing a recall to fix the problem. They have to know that this is a large scale problem that has been causing customers problems and makes the company look bad. Jackson makes great guitars but they definately dropped the ball on this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mick1234 View PostWelcome to the club!
Mine dk2m have been a nightmare, this is my third ex and its currently been shipped back to Fender/Jackson.
I wish i never bought it, should´ve just bought a used Charvel or older Jackson model.
Comment
-
Originally posted by damon1 View PostI don't understand why Jackson isn't doing a recall to fix the problem.Sam
Comment
-
Originally posted by emperor_black View Postwhy do u think guitar center is selling them off at clearance price and even pulling them out of their online inventory? Its being discontinued. Whatever changes they did to their production line to get the dk2m out, did not work or it was too expensive to build them at the price they were being sold, or too many qc issues. those are the major reasons for a discontinuation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by [email protected] View Postnot liking what i'm seeing here guys. I've got a white bengal on the way. I'll look for this issue imediately when I get it. Thanks for the heads up!
Here is a couple photos. Hope all is well with this bad boy.
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c2...hitebengal.jpg
Comment
-
Originally posted by damon1 View PostI love those bengals, cool guitar. I wouldn't worry about the problems I and others had, just check it out when you recieve it and if it's not right, get a call tag and have it sent back for a refund/exchange. I had zero problems returning mine. Just be optimistic that yours will be golden.Steve Kennington
Charlotte,NC
Comment
Comment