I was eyeballing some Jackson Stars guitars today and I noticed that the KE's, KV's, and RR's in the J1 range had ash bodies. I was wondering if they were a light swamp ash or a heavy hard ash. I've seen that some of you guys have some nice Jackson Stars semi-customs and various jaw-dropping stock models, I was hoping I could get some of your opinions on this.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jackson Stars J1 Ash Body Question
Collapse
X
-
It's heavy ash. My ash RR feels much heavier than my alder and poplar ones.
I think that Straycat here (not shure about his pseudo) has both mahogany and ash Jackson Stars RRs, it would be interesting to know how heavy ash is compared to mahogany.
Anyway, if you can bear a bit more weight on your shoulders, you can't go wrong with a Jackson Stars J12007 Jackson Stars RR Custom
2005 Jackson Stars RR Semi-custom
1991 Grover Jackson RR Dan Spitz Professional
1991 Grover Jackson RR Custom (sold)
-
Thanks Wild Claw.
Another concern of mine is that I work at a music store and with my discount I could get a USA KV-2 or KE-2 for about the same price as a J1. I noticed you have some nice older Jacksons and some new Jackson Stars. How would you compare them?"I got a fever, and the only prescription is more Jacksons"
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdamFisher5150 View PostThanks Wild Claw.
Another concern of mine is that I work at a music store and with my discount I could get a USA KV-2 or KE-2 for about the same price as a J1. I noticed you have some nice older Jacksons and some new Jackson Stars. How would you compare them?
By the way, note that these two Grovers were made in Japan, not in the US. The Spitz is a Professional serie - like the well-know RR pro based on the RR1 - and the Custom is from another serie but the quality was similar.
So all I can tell you is that they really are awesome guitars, but I can't compare them to the USA ones cause I've never owned any ... Suppose the J1s and select serie would be equal in quality, then you have to see what wood you'd prefer. This may help you : http://www.guitarsatbmusic.com.au/es...t_print_42.pdf2007 Jackson Stars RR Custom
2005 Jackson Stars RR Semi-custom
1991 Grover Jackson RR Dan Spitz Professional
1991 Grover Jackson RR Custom (sold)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild Claw View PostBy the way, note that these two Grovers were made in Japan, not in the US. The Spitz is a Professional serie - like the well-know RR pro based on the RR1 - and the Custom is from another serie but the quality was similar.
Originally posted by Wild Claw View PostThe only noticable difference is that the older ones have a non-recessed trem, while the new ones have a recessed one.Last edited by AdamFisher5150; 08-30-2009, 09:57 PM."I got a fever, and the only prescription is more Jacksons"
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdamFisher5150 View PostIs it the XTRR shape or a normal RR?
Hmm, I prefer non-recessed trems. What years did they make them that way? A King V like that would be dangerously close to perfect.
The KV from the Custom Serie has a non-recessed trem.2007 Jackson Stars RR Custom
2005 Jackson Stars RR Semi-custom
1991 Grover Jackson RR Dan Spitz Professional
1991 Grover Jackson RR Custom (sold)
Comment
-
I guess that would be me Wild Claw was referring too... I own a mahogany RRJ1B semicustom and bought the stock version a year later. Indeed, with the ash body the stock version is noticeably heavier. Definitely hard ash.
Comment
-
I have a 2006 RR-J1 ash body, EMGs, I really don't notice that it's super heavy but I'm a big guy, so...
Also, to decide between this type of model vs a USA Select, you need to decide if you want ash over alder.
Discussion of build quality is moot, as the high end Stars are pretty much equal to USA.
Also, the Stars are of course more rare here in the States, I rather like that aspect. Also the 24 fret Rhoads thing, sometimes that gets noticed when I do a gig and the guys who notice it get really excited."Quiet, numbskulls, I'm broadcasting!" -Moe Howard, "Micro-Phonies" (1945)
Comment
Comment