When i played bass years ago,i played rics,how do jacksons compare? i kinda want a bass just for laying down tracks to give the guys ideas on originals and goof'n around with.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How do Jackson basses compare to...
Collapse
X
-
Jackson Basses
Dude, you are on the Jackson/Charvel forum so what do you expect. I have owned a Jackson bass for 20 years, and nothing, I mean nothing, can touch it. For BASS players, it is hot, looks killer, plays well, etc. The best bass guitar ever made. I wish they would go back and make bass guitars like they used to - we're players too!
-
Jacksons are decent... they don't beat rics tho."There is nothing more fearful than imagination without taste" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"To be stupid, selfish and have good health are three requirements for happiness, though if stupidity is lacking, all is lost" - Gustave Flaubert
Comment
-
i had a ric and i loved it but the neck was way different than my jacksons. the ric was very thin and flat. the jacksons and charvels i have feel better (to me). that's why i still have thej/c and not the ric! lol the ric had a twangier,(is that a word?) lol, sound. i have some jacksons with the j2000 electronics and some with emgs and i like those better than the ric tones when i record. besides, ric cost about twice what you can get a usa jackson bass. even better bargin is the model series charvels 86-89The Truth Hurts Only If It's Supposed To !
Comment
-
Originally posted by peabuddy View Posti had a ric and i loved it but the neck was way different than my jacksons. the ric was very thin and flat. the jacksons and charvels i have feel better (to me). that's why i still have thej/c and not the ric! lol the ric had a twangier,(is that a word?) lol, sound. i have some jacksons with the j2000 electronics and some with emgs and i like those better than the ric tones when i record. besides, ric cost about twice what you can get a usa jackson bass. even better bargin is the model series charvels 86-89www.thejimmyhatz.com
Comment
-
A Ric will all ways be a different animal.A Ric is more a vintage tone.The wireing is way different the Rics have a 5 way jack for the Ric box.A stereo splitter of sorts so the tones are so different how can you compare them?Really? well screw Mark Twain.
Comment
-
G&L 2000s..
are the ultimate bass..IMO!
In my 30 years of playing bass ..I've owned Kubicki, Warwick, Pedulla, Alembic, Ken Smith, Rics, P and J's, Ken Smith, Yamaha BB 300s, Sting Rays, Spectors, and Jackson..and ect.
I'll take a G&L 2000 over any the above..Ken Smith comes in second.
I love the classic look of a Ric..but they "buzz", the pups are weak, they are not very versatile and the action is unstable with climate changes..
Besides, they sound like shit when your slappin' them.."Bill, Smoke a Bowl and Crank Van Halen I, Life is better when I do that"
Donnie Swanstrom 01/25/06..miss ya!
"Well, your friend would have Bell's Palsy, which is a facial paralysis, not "Balls Pelsy" like we're joking about here." Toejam's attempt at sensitivity.
Comment
-
Oh..I'd take a Ric over a Jackson tho..
I had import Jacksons as back up basses..because I didn't care too much if they got F'd up or stolen."Bill, Smoke a Bowl and Crank Van Halen I, Life is better when I do that"
Donnie Swanstrom 01/25/06..miss ya!
"Well, your friend would have Bell's Palsy, which is a facial paralysis, not "Balls Pelsy" like we're joking about here." Toejam's attempt at sensitivity.
Comment
-
G&L
Originally posted by horns666 View PostG&L 2000s..
are the ultimate bass..IMO!
In my 30 years of playing bass ..I've owned Kubicki, Warwick, Pedulla, Alembic, Ken Smith, Rics, P and J's, Ken Smith, Yamaha BB 300s, Sting Rays, Spectors, and Jackson..and ect.
I'll take a G&L 2000 over any the above..Ken Smith comes in second.
I love the classic look of a Ric..but they "buzz", the pups are weak, they are not very versatile and the action is unstable with climate changes..
Besides, they sound like shit when your slappin' them..
Comment
Comment