Is this a big issue? I've always noticed some do and some don't have neck angles. My rr definitely doesn't.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Limited floyd pull-up?
Collapse
X
-
With a recessed trem, the neck should be flat and have no neck angle (or very little) so the trem sits close to the body.
You need the neck to be angled back for a guitar with a non-recessed trem so it'll put the trem higher off the body so the strings won't fret out.I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Comment
-
Daaaamn look how the fretboard is LEVEL with the pup rings! Thats just rediculous. Either the body wings are set on the neck blank too high or theres no neck angle, but thats definetly a defectice axe. Christ, you cant even have the pups sticking up at all.Imagine, being able to be magically whisked away to... Delaware. Hi... Im in... Delaware...
Comment
-
Originally posted by toejam View PostLooks like the neck is actually angled forward.
Nah I bought it off GC online used. Im really happy with it the playability is just fine. its just the pull-up clearance that bugs me
Comment
-
Could you guys be more specific in what this "obvious" defect is? I have 4 soloists ranging from 91-2007 and I don't see anything "obviously" different from mine as far as the neck goes. If the neck angle is just the angle that the neck meets the body, all of mine look the same as the ones pictured. All of them have recessed tremelos.
If it's something you need a micrometer to check, that's one thing. But I don't see anything "obvious."I only need one more guitar.
Comment
-
nah it cant be that, yesterday during the string change I was pivoting the floyd on the studs with my hand without strings attached checking where it was making contact with the body. The place where it makes contact first is the base plate with the body cavity near the treble-side pivot stud.
Comment
Comment