I've heard from at least two people now, other guitarists, that a soloist (and maybe all USA Jacksons) have lead in them? When I mention owning a soloist, I get the question "It's pretty heavy, isn't it?" followed by "I heard those have lead in the body for weight." One guitarist I met from out of town said that a friend of a friend was a guitar tech for Stryper for a while, and was talking about the lead in the body of the Jacksons they use. Anyone else ever hear of this? Or is this a myth of some sort?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jacksons with lead? myth?
Collapse
X
-
Some nut job told me Les Pauls had lead plates in them (rumor/fact? the early 80's silverburst had lead paint.) Although...... there was a Kelly on the 'bay a lil while back that DID have lead in it, but thats all I know of. I'd say there is no lead in the bodies."illegal downloading saved people from having to buy that piece of shit you tried to pass off as music" - Nighbat
Comment
-
that's why you should never leave your Soloist unattended in a baby's crib
maybe the folks perpetuating this story are thinking of the "loaded" Kramers from the late 80s/early 90s. They used to advertise models that had metal either attached to the body or installed in cavities. Because we all know "mass increases sustain", right? Some mob were selling brass plates to attach to your headstock too, for the same reason. I guess playing through high gain amps wasn't giving the guitar-playing public enough sustain....Hail yesterday
Comment
-
Heh as others have mentioned, we've seen at least one Kelly that someone threw a chunk of lead in the body to combat their perceived balance problems. I'm sure it's happened in other instances.
The kramer with metal in them were from the showster series:
Comment
-
It's all about the blues-rock chatter.
Originally posted by RD...so now I have this massive empty house with my Harley, Guns, Guitar and nothing else...
Comment
Comment