I like 'em too. Haven't spent a lot of time with one though. I'd love to play a gig with one to see if it addresses the hand cramping issues that inevitably plague me with my Fusions. I do love my Fusions though
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Not in love with soloists....
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by VitaminG View PostI'd love to play a gig with one to see if it addresses the hand cramping issues that inevitably plague me with my Fusions._______________________
semi-automatic hate machine...
Comment
-
Originally posted by VitaminG View PostI like 'em too. Haven't spent a lot of time with one though. I'd love to play a gig with one to see if it addresses the hand cramping issues that inevitably plague me with my Fusions. I do love my Fusions though
Comment
-
Originally posted by RacerX View PostHmmm, you'll probably not love playing the Kelly shape either then!
So even though I don't expect to love a Kelly as much as a soloist, I would be happy if I liked it as much as my Rhoads. I have been playing the dinky/fusion/soloist shape for over 25 years, so it just feels like home to me. That shape combined with neckthrough construction is my favorite, but other shapes with neckthrough are definitely good too.
Comment
-
My one and only complaint or issue, actually, is that if the neck goes south, the whole guitar went with it. In that instance, its a throw away guitar. A veeery expensive throw away guitar. Not only would it cost as much as the guitar to have it fixed, it also requires taking the wings off the guitar, which when it comes down to it, youve replaced the guitar, and just kept the original wings. Chances are, any soul that guitar had was in the neck and the part that of the neck that is the center of the body.Last edited by Twitch; 09-01-2011, 09:12 PM.HTTP 404 - Signature Not Found
Comment
-
Originally posted by GuerillaPete View PostCramping? That could be from the angle/height/position the guitar hangs off you, no?
Originally posted by j2379 View PostI have that problem with Gibson 60's slim taper necks, try guitars with bigger necks if thats a real issue.Hail yesterday
Comment
-
Originally posted by Twitch View PostMy one and only complaint or issue, actually, is that if the neck goes south, the whole guitar went with it. In that instance, its a throw away guitar. A veeery expensive throw away guitar. Not only would it cost as much as the guitar to have it fixed, it also requires taking the wings off the guitar, which when it comes down to it, youve replaced the guitar, and just kept the original wings. Chances are, any soul that guitar had was in the neck and the part that of the neck that is the center of the body.Hail yesterday
Comment
-
Seriously, Twitch, that should not be a concern at all. There are neck through guitars from the 60's like a Gibson Firebird for example, that haven't "gone south." If you take care of it, like any instrument, it will outlast you. In fact, a neck through guitar is probably more stable than a bolt on. Besides, what the hell would have to happen to make the neck "go south?" !!! Like dropping the guitar from a 4 story building?"Got a crazy feeling I don't understand,
Gotta get away from here.
Feelin' like I shoulda kept my feet on the ground
Waitin' for the sun to appear..."
Comment
-
Originally posted by coloradoman25 View PostGotta ask I saw this posted in the SL2H thread....Whats the ratio of love vs eh.. for soloists?Last edited by Twitch; 09-02-2011, 02:01 AM.HTTP 404 - Signature Not Found
Comment
-
I've heard that same argument on many forums and don't get it either. Unless a person is extremely careless, reckless, tries to destroy things, etc., I don't understand choosing an instrument based on how adverse to destruction it is. As far as being able to change the neck easily on a bolt-on instrument: yeah, that is true but the neck is a big part of the overall package on bolt-ons too. When you put a new neck on one, the instrument can change quite a bit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chad View PostI've heard that same argument on many forums and don't get it either. Unless a person is extremely careless, reckless, tries to destroy things, etc., I don't understand choosing an instrument based on how adverse to destruction it is. As far as being able to change the neck easily on a bolt-on instrument: yeah, that is true but the neck is a big part of the overall package on bolt-ons too. When you put a new neck on one, the instrument can change quite a bit.
For example, if you have a 24-fret USA Dinky and snap the headstock where do you get another USA Dinky neck? They are rare as hen's teeth and if you did find one it would cost a lot of money. I guess you could get a DK2 neck but, it's not the same... So, do you buy another USA Dinky? :think:
Sure, it's great that you can bolt a Warmoth or USACG or whatever neck onto a Strat if you snap the neck but I'd bet that's a very tiny portion of those company's actual sales.
Comment
-
Well what would you do if you have a 24-fret USA Soloist and snap the headstock? Glue it back on? Do the same with the Dinky.It's all about the blues-rock chatter.
Originally posted by RD...so now I have this massive empty house with my Harley, Guns, Guitar and nothing else...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Devotee View PostWell what would you do if you have a 24-fret USA Soloist and snap the headstock? Glue it back on? Do the same with the Dinky.
Comment
Comment