Hi, I am trying to restore (as best as I can) my 1992 Jackson soloist to its original pickups, and any help to that end is greatly appreciated.
First, a little background. About 23 years ago I ordered a Jackson soloist, with a lightning sky graphic on it from Sam Ash. It took a while to arrive. (I was told they were made 12 at a time in Canada, even though it says "Made in the USA" on the headstock). But eventually, it came and I loved it. It has serial number u01854 stamped on the 24th fret. It had a midboost and Jackson pickups on it (H/S/S configuration).
1. First question: So I guess this is considered a custom shop Jackson soloist because of the lightning sky graphic, or no?
But then few years later, the midboost system went bad and gave me all sorts of hum and noise. I took it back to Sam Ash and they recommended I go with emg pickups (81 in the bridge and 2 SAs for the middle and neck). The emg pickups were ok, but I always missed my old Jackson pickups. Unfortunately, I have no idea what happened to my original pickups; somewhere over the last 20 years I lost them...
Skipping ahead to today, I was able to locate a JE-1200 mid boost system, two J-200 pickups (neck and middle from a Charvel model 4 guitar) and what I believe is a J-50BC ceramic humbucker bridge pickup (its from a Charvel model 6 guitar--on the back of the bridge pickup it says: "Jackson Pickups. Made in U.S.A. Model 6 Bridge."
2. Second question: So, is there a good chance I have assembled the correct 3 pickups and midboost system to come close to what my 1992 Jackson soloist had? Or did some soloists have the alnico version of the J-50?
On page 44 of the 1990-1991 Jackson Catalog, they have a picture of Doug Aldrich next to the only Soloist in that catalog and it says "JE-1200... two J-200 bi-level humbucking pickups at the front and middle positions ... At the bridge, a J-50BC hubmcking pickup..." The 1992 Jackson Catalog discusses the same pickups for the "Soloist Pro"--however it lists the bridge humbucker as a J-50M.
3. Third question: Was the J-50M the same as the J-50BC or was the J-50M different (maybe it was alnico instead of ceramic)?
Any help is appreciated; and thanks so much for reading this.
Peace,
HG
First, a little background. About 23 years ago I ordered a Jackson soloist, with a lightning sky graphic on it from Sam Ash. It took a while to arrive. (I was told they were made 12 at a time in Canada, even though it says "Made in the USA" on the headstock). But eventually, it came and I loved it. It has serial number u01854 stamped on the 24th fret. It had a midboost and Jackson pickups on it (H/S/S configuration).
1. First question: So I guess this is considered a custom shop Jackson soloist because of the lightning sky graphic, or no?
But then few years later, the midboost system went bad and gave me all sorts of hum and noise. I took it back to Sam Ash and they recommended I go with emg pickups (81 in the bridge and 2 SAs for the middle and neck). The emg pickups were ok, but I always missed my old Jackson pickups. Unfortunately, I have no idea what happened to my original pickups; somewhere over the last 20 years I lost them...
Skipping ahead to today, I was able to locate a JE-1200 mid boost system, two J-200 pickups (neck and middle from a Charvel model 4 guitar) and what I believe is a J-50BC ceramic humbucker bridge pickup (its from a Charvel model 6 guitar--on the back of the bridge pickup it says: "Jackson Pickups. Made in U.S.A. Model 6 Bridge."
2. Second question: So, is there a good chance I have assembled the correct 3 pickups and midboost system to come close to what my 1992 Jackson soloist had? Or did some soloists have the alnico version of the J-50?
On page 44 of the 1990-1991 Jackson Catalog, they have a picture of Doug Aldrich next to the only Soloist in that catalog and it says "JE-1200... two J-200 bi-level humbucking pickups at the front and middle positions ... At the bridge, a J-50BC hubmcking pickup..." The 1992 Jackson Catalog discusses the same pickups for the "Soloist Pro"--however it lists the bridge humbucker as a J-50M.
3. Third question: Was the J-50M the same as the J-50BC or was the J-50M different (maybe it was alnico instead of ceramic)?
Any help is appreciated; and thanks so much for reading this.
Peace,
HG
Comment