Wow glad this made it back to safe hands.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Scored today
Collapse
X
-
Personally I'd find a set of Jackson pups to go in to fit that oversized ring and look original again. Something weird is going on with that front route, my guess is it was originally non-flanged, then somebody enlarged it slightly for a flanged pup, then somebody put an EMG in which doesn't even need the flange?? You could find a non-flanged J100 to go in, or enlarge that route properly to fit a flanged pup with proper clearance. The off-white EMG's look like shit in there._________________________________________________
"Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
- Ken M
Comment
-
Originally posted by defec View PostRight. the neck plate threw me. The guitar is made in Jan 1988. Were there any Jackson bolt on's made in San Dimas?"Got a crazy feeling I don't understand,
Gotta get away from here.
Feelin' like I shoulda kept my feet on the ground
Waitin' for the sun to appear..."
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by defec View PostAxewielder, i wonder which Jackson hum would match the guitar. j-80? I agree about the color of the EMG's. I'm going to attempt to paint them black before installing them in something else._________________________________________________
"Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
- Ken M
Comment
-
Very nice guitar, congratulate. This is the first I see with non reverse headstock. The tone control seems original to me, because the togle is closer to the volume pot as usual.
Mine had this japanese made J90C pickup and a J100 single. I don't suggest this type of pickup. If you wants a good tone, buy instead a made in usa J90 or any other non f-spaced pickup and you can use an original jackson pickup cover to look the guitar original.
Comment
Comment