Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

90s usa jackson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 90s usa jackson

    Hey all,

    I’m looking at getting a Jackson or Charvel and have scoured reverb. Anybody know anything about this?



    i don’t know much about Jacksons. How does the seller even come up with that price. He doesnt seem to know much about it either

  • #2
    Looks like a strat body which would mean its from the 80s. It has the smaller electronics routing so it would be 86-87. Hard to tell much more from those pics. Other than its overpriced.

    Comment


    • #3
      Definitely 80's and not 90's. That's hot! TM headstock, possibly an SD, can you get the S/N?
      _________________________________________________
      "Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
      - Ken M

      Comment


      • #4
        That's absolutely worth checking out.
        96xxxxx, 97xxxxx and 98xxxxx serials oftentimes don't indicate '96, '97 and '98.

        Comment


        • #5
          There are a few of these (5 or 6), these are from 1986. Some have a Charvel neckplate with late Charvel serial number and some have a Jackson neckplate with early Jackson serial number. Both versions have a Jackson TM Logo.
          The tremolo is probably not the original one, because the models I "know" originally came with a Kahler 2500 and each of them has been replaced for a Floyd Rose.
          Last edited by busdriver; 04-02-2018, 11:21 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Jackson 4 digit neck plate.

            Pic not clear enough to get serial number.
            Attached Files
            -Rick

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks guys. It is a sweet guitar for sure. I’ll see if he answers my serial request

              Comment


              • #8
                Another sweet one

                Comment


                • #9
                  Guy responded with serial #1427.

                  Must be a 1986 out of San Dimas?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by krabby5 View Post
                    Guy responded with serial #1427.

                    Must be a 1986 out of San Dimas?
                    Yep... last of the SD era guitars.
                    -Rick

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This guitar was posted 2 years ago. I wonder what up? It’s not THAT over priced?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by krabby5 View Post
                        This guitar was posted 2 years ago. I wonder what up? It’s not THAT over priced?
                        Green snake sold today. To answer your question, description basically just says plays great/sounds great, doesn't every guitar for sale say that? no mention of a case, no mention of the trem bar. In looking at the body pic, there could be damage to the body/paint next to the corner of the floyd where the trem bar goes in, the pickups aren't original, the headsock has a lot of weird circlular scratches, the truss rod cover isn't original (note that the cover is smaller than the two mounting screws near the floyd), the floyd thru-the-neck mounting screws are filled/plugged, the two screws holding the floyd to the neck are wrong. If I was contemplating on spending that much, I'd want a lot more description and a lot more & better pictures.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          For me, personally, guitars with maple boards can look extremely odd depending on the headstock.
                          I can't go for black headstocks with maple boards, unless, maybe, it is a black guitar. Maple boards need maple headstocks, or possibly color matched to the body.

                          Oh, and the headstock was pointing the wrong way. But we all have our preferences.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            yep the plugged floyd nut mounting bolt holes scares me.

                            Originally posted by MountainDog View Post
                            Green snake sold today. To answer your question, description basically just says plays great/sounds great, doesn't every guitar for sale say that? no mention of a case, no mention of the trem bar. In looking at the body pic, there could be damage to the body/paint next to the corner of the floyd where the trem bar goes in, the pickups aren't original, the headsock has a lot of weird circlular scratches, the truss rod cover isn't original (note that the cover is smaller than the two mounting screws near the floyd), the floyd thru-the-neck mounting screws are filled/plugged, the two screws holding the floyd to the neck are wrong. If I was contemplating on spending that much, I'd want a lot more description and a lot more & better pictures.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I actually ended up buying it. I called the store and talked to the owner for awhile. The recessed area where the floyd sits was cut a little too large on the trem bar side. Other than that, the body is pretty fricken nice. No nicks or crazy scratches. The neck is perfect and plays like butter. I LOVE the neck pickup..whatever it is. I didn’t love the bridge too much until i raised it some. Sounds like a JB or something similar. The screws that hold the clamps down in the nut are stripped, but i had extras and threw them in. Overall I’m very happy with this 32 year old guitar! Definitely has some mojo. Did I Overpay? Maybe. But I’ve been looking for a long time for a 80s era Jackson/Charvel that had all the things i wanted.
                              thanks for all the replies too!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X