Ok, I'm looking to buy a Warrior, but haven't had a chance to play one yet. I already have an RR1 and love it to death . Playwise, are they similar ? I know they both go 25 1/2 scale , but curious about the neck profile. Any help would really be appreciated.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RR1 vs Warrior
Collapse
X
-
LOL Warrior has a THINNER neck profile. WR, KE and KV have the same 775/835 "faster" neck, while RR and SL have 790/850 profile which is a bit more rounded as well.
To me it isn't a significant difference, though I like 790/850 profile betterLast edited by Carbophos; 12-13-2006, 03:12 AM.Because I don't say it
Doesn't mean I ain't thinking it
Comment
-
The Rhoads neck sits more level to the ground, the Warrior neck points up nicely. The Rhoads neck also sits more to the left, while the Warrior is a little more centered to your body... in other words, the 24th fret on a Warrior is closer to the center of your body, the Rhoads is to the left of you...
The Warrior is great sitting down. Perhaps the best body style for sitting. Once you plant it in your lap, you don't even need to hold the guitar, no squeezing your legs together, and the neck just 'floats' in that proper spot.
The Rhoads needs to have one leg raised, your legs clenched, and the neck tends to dip when you let it go.
Both are excellent guitars to play while standing.The 2nd Amendment: America's Original Homeland Defense.
Comment
-
Hey guys,
I'm also in this kind of position.
I also have a RR1 but 've been dreaming of a WR1 for quite a while now.
Does the sightly thinner neck influence the sound significantly compared to the RR's? I mean, because of the neck-through, it (RR) sounds full yet hollowish and it misses a kind of 'snap' IMHO.
I mean, I have a PCS Dinky with a bolt on speed-neck (supposedly like in the WR1s) and I was wondering if you could compare it more with the RR1 (due to the neck-through) or the Dinky...?
I know, stupid question, but I've been thinking of getting a custom warrior built, with bolt-on neck...
thanks
Comment
-
You really should play one. I really liked the looks of a warrior. It looks badass. I played Darksaga's Warrior and also played a Rhoads. I would take the rhoads any day of the week. It was just so much more comfortable and playable to me.
-NateInsert annoying equipment list here....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iced Dragon View PostHey guys,
I'm also in this kind of position.
I also have a RR1 but 've been dreaming of a WR1 for quite a while now.
Does the sightly thinner neck influence the sound significantly compared to the RR's? I mean, because of the neck-through, it (RR) sounds full yet hollowish and it misses a kind of 'snap' IMHO.
I mean, I have a PCS Dinky with a bolt on speed-neck (supposedly like in the WR1s) and I was wondering if you could compare it more with the RR1 (due to the neck-through) or the Dinky...?
I know, stupid question, but I've been thinking of getting a custom warrior built, with bolt-on neck...
thanksBecause I don't say it
Doesn't mean I ain't thinking it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carbophos View PostLOL Warrior has a THINNER neck profile. WR, KE and KV have the same 775/835 "faster" neck, while RR and SL have 790/850 profile which is a bit more rounded as well.
But .015" isn't much as Carbophos says.
Comment
Comment