Originally posted by Mario8672
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Good points of the KE2 (deciding on a gtr.)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mario8672 View PostJemsite's main arguments:
-5 piece neck is more stable than the quartersawn necks (not sure)
-Edge Pro stays in tune better than OFR
-Much better fretwork
-smooth neck finish on the jem definitely beats the finished jackson necks (I can agree)
----
what do ya'll have to say about that? true or false?
- Never had any problems with the stability of either neck. However, the Kelly resonates soooooooo much better. The Jem feels inanimate in my hands.
- Sorry Ibanez enthusiasts but IMHO the edge pro is not a good bridge. On all the Ibanez's I've played/owned, I've never liked it. If you're looking for a floyded guitar get a Floyded guitar. (I like hardtails, what do I know )
- Jackson USA fretwork is top quality. No problems here!
- That is a matter of choice. I prefer painted necks, both for the feel and because I think they look better.
It's a matter of taste, preferences and style. Get the axe that suits your need better. They are both top quality in materials and workmanship, have no fear.
Happy hunting!I feel festive all year round. Deal with it.
Comment
-
Kelly user has laid down all the best differences.
Adding one more, a very important one...
Basswood / Alder
IMO basswood is crap! I owned a basswood Ibanez earlier and something was missing about the tone. Then got into mahogany guitars, still something's missing. Alder nails the "metal" cutting-thru the mix tone.
KE-2 is my choice. The vine inlays look cheap and the fretwork is no where close to the US made guitars. Also, the looks!
But before you ask this question KE-2 or JEM, have you considered the fact that if you want a new Jackson AND if the one you like is not in stock with the dealers, then one last difference
12 months or more wait time / almost immediately availableSam
Comment
-
To me those are really incomparable axes, because they have very different , feel, tone and overall idea behind them. And depending on taste and priorities both have pros and cons.
And I must make one important notice: White JEM7V has an ALDER body.Because I don't say it
Doesn't mean I ain't thinking it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carbophos View PostTo me those are really incomparable axes, because they have very different , feel, tone and overall idea behind them. And depending on taste and priorities both have pros and cons.
And I must make one important notice: White JEM7V has an ALDER body.
Comment
-
Thanks for all of the responses so far! I told jemsite your main arguments, and
they say that "the holes drilled on the neck don't affect the stability too much because the neck is already very stable (5 piece). Fret access is much better on the JEM because of the all access neck joint. And the fact that the controls are front-loaded doesn't mean that it has less wood, the routing is the same size as rear-loaded guitars."
-------------------
Yep, the JEM7V is alderJackson SL2H (nebula) '08
Gibson Les Paul Standard (ebony) '03
Marshall JCM800 50W + Marshall 2x12
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thwap View PostAnd you knew what it meant...
So you either play...or watch it.:ROTF:"slappy, slappy" bill sings, happily, as he dick slaps random people on the streets of Cleveland.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mario8672 View PostThanks for all of the responses so far! I told jemsite your main arguments, and
they say that "the holes drilled on the neck don't affect the stability too much because the neck is already very stable (5 piece). Fret access is much better on the JEM because of the all access neck joint. And the fact that the controls are front-loaded doesn't mean that it has less wood, the routing is the same size as rear-loaded guitars."
-------------------
Yep, the JEM7V is alder"slappy, slappy" bill sings, happily, as he dick slaps random people on the streets of Cleveland.
Comment
Comment