USA Soloist porn!

[RayOHope]

2004 USA Soloist

[gravol]

Trans Black with reverse headstock: All hardware swithed to black instead of chrome. EMG -81 & -85 added...


Employee project: Snow white, no inlays ebony fingerboard, black binding over frets. Added EMG -81 and Black Floyd instead of chrome...

[wakeUPdead]

'93 Archtop Soloist (one of Jack's old one's; now with new electronics)


-Austin

This I love.

[slayer]

This I love.

Yep, that one was mine at one time. The neck was a little too thinnish for me, but she looks great still Jack.

[toejam]

The one sat on top of the amp is a 750XL I sold to Mikernaut here.

A Charvel 750XL with a Jackson logo?!?

[Mikernaut2]

A Charvel 750XL with a Jackson logo?!?

yup, it is very professionally done too with an Foil like material




Hmmm what song was I playing?

Does a COW count as a soloist?

[Mikernaut2]

[/QUOTE]

I remember when you had your auctions up, I reallllllly wanted that white soloist with the white emgs . But someone got it before the auction was up. So I just went for the 750xl.


I have a weakness for white guitars. The others posted in this thread are great. matching headstock / blank ebony board and the other with the black body binding are stunning.

[toejam]

A Charvel 750XL with a Jackson logo?!?

yup, it is very professionally done too with an Foil like material

Ah, pretty sneaky!

[SEAN RAF]

Yes, was a metallic blue, then had it refinished. As I hated the toothpaste logo, I had Jackson put on instead...

[pebber]

[pebber]

[Mikernaut2]

Theres just a few soloists , heh

I still like that weird b&w graphic ( the guitar to the right of the Nagel) with the red dot triangles . As I recall it glows in the dark right?

[roodyrocker]

Pebber, those are all Shannon Soloists correct? I have a Slime Green one and a BGF one. Thats awesome that you have the whole set including the prorotype

Rudy

https://www.wickedrocks.com

[DC_rhoads82]

lovin the bgf soloist!

[pebber]

it glows in the dark right?

100% correct

those are all Shannon Soloists, including the prorotype, correct?

again.. 100% correct