could be...only time will tell...tbh i have never understood the "need" for 24 frets...nice to have but not a requirement for me...d.m.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Jacksons in 2008!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by åron View PostI've found I could really use at least 23, and often play the "soft" 23rd, fretless style.
Hmm.. a 23 fret custom. I bet there's not too many of those out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RacerX View PostI reject your pitiful theory, diablomozart!
The RR5 is no "SD memorial model" so why would the KV5 be? Also IMO Jackson is throwing sales away by issuing it with 22 frets.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zeegler View Post...and by putting a shitty licensed Floyd copy on everything.
That's what I,m afraid of with the new RR5! is it going to have a shitty licensed floyd copy, or a REAL OFR like on the RR24......................"When a naked man is chasing a woman through an ally with a butcher's knife and a hard-on, I figure he isn't out collecting for the Red Cross"............ Dirty Harry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brooke View PostThey still said Floyd Rose on them,,but they are still Ping's//
Where not going to go through this again, are we................?"When a naked man is chasing a woman through an ally with a butcher's knife and a hard-on, I figure he isn't out collecting for the Red Cross"............ Dirty Harry
Comment
-
There's a KV2 with the new green on the bay already.
A KV5 would be sweet, I've always responded to the "What do you want from J/C" threads that there needs to be a Pro-series KV. I just hope it has neck binding, I don't care for the unbound neck on the RR5.Unleash the fury.....Texas style!
Comment
Comment