Originally posted by Cannella
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
(pre-) Fender Jacksons
Collapse
X
-
Absolutely one of the funnier threads in quite some time!
Outstanding Bane!
Comment
-
I've noticed more reports of issues like twisted necks, poor fretwork, off center trem/pickup routs and the like. And for a while at least, they were using very ruddy looking ebony boards. I think the failure to follow a work order is a post FMIC thing too. They can still make some good guitars. They just kick out way more dogs now than they used to.
Just my 2¢
Comment
-
I think they kick out way more dogs only because they are kicking out way more guitars these days.Scott
Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by levantin View PostCheck this out, a post Fender Jackson as described by Sunbane:
Originally posted by Cannella View PostSUNBANE Please do a little research before you vent a blast of nonsense that isn't true. In all actuallity the staff building Jackson are all the original guys including Mike Shannon, Pablo Santana, and Grover Jackson himself. Unless someone is diguising themselves to look like them, then 2 weeks ago they were still there. As far as Alexi I am not sure where you made that one up but please for the sake spreading news, please don't make up things that are not true just to get attention.
Originally posted by DonP View PostI have 3 USA neck thrus - a 1992 RR1, a 1995 RR1 and a 2005 SL2H. I wouldn't be able to tell the difference if blindfolded. Neck profiles all similar; quality is great on all 3.Hail yesterday
Comment
-
Thx for the answers. My question was ment kinda specificly. Like do they use other machines to make them, and with the same people, at the same plants,...
Maybe that wasnt so clear. These aspects doesnt seem to have changed, do they? So in theory they should be off equal level.
PS: Sorry for my English. It could be that i write stuff that doesnt exist, but languages never were my best thingies in school.Last edited by Fretboard; 03-11-2008, 03:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StukaJU87 View PostI think they kick out way more dogs only because they are kicking out way more guitars these days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fretboard View PostThx for the answers. My question was ment kinda specificly. Like do they use other machines to make them, and with the same people, at the same plants,...
Maybe that wasnt so clear. These aspects doesnt seem to have changed, do they? So in theory they should be off equal level.
PS: Sorry for my English. It could be that i write stuff that doesnt exist, but languages never were my best thingies in school.
Yes, there were changes to the production of USA Jackson/Charvels after Fender's takeover:
Production was moved to Fender's facilities in Corona, but JCMI has its own little space in there, with its own personnel (so the Jacksons are not made on the same production line as the Fenders).
We do know that JCMI recieved new machines (CNC mills etc) when they moved into their new quarters. I've read someplace that the old ones back in Ontario were in dire need of replacing at that point (but I can't remember who stated that, so take it with a bucket of salt).
As far as I know, a lot of the old work force followed JCMI to Corona. Fender even put Mike Shannon back into the fold (he had up until then been a master builder in the Fender Custom Shop). Grover Jackson's recent appearance seems to be more of a temporary thing - a marketing move, aimed at the "nostalgia" demography.
There have been complaints about QC issues both prior to, and after Fender's buyout.
Edit: So, when you see someone advertising a "Pre-Fender" Jackson, it's basically just hot air. Jacksons are still Jacksons. Fenders are still Fenders.Last edited by Sunbane; 03-11-2008, 07:31 PM.
Comment
Comment