Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lighter Jacksons or Heavier?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lighter Jacksons or Heavier?

    Of the Gibsons I have previously owned, the lighter ones (SGs, Vs, and Les Pauls) were more resonant and sounded better. But with my USA Jacksons, the heavier ones seem to sustain longer and sound better. What is your experience/preference with USA Jacksons?
    Last edited by PHATSO; 11-24-2008, 10:37 AM.

  • #2
    My 87 Jackson super strat is 10.6 lbs and its made of maple it rings like a bell and sustains forever.All out tone monster.I have a 2002 Music Yo Kramer that weighs nothing(alder) sounds absolutly huge and it sustains forever too go figure.
    Really? well screw Mark Twain.

    Comment


    • #3
      edit: ah now i get it...

      admin may delete this.
      Last edited by Evil Homer; 11-24-2008, 04:31 AM.
      '97 KV1 alder

      Comment


      • #4
        i dont own any usa jacksons but my kelly sounds fuller than my rhoads.
        les pauls are one of the lighter ones? they seem heavy as hell to me.

        Comment


        • #5
          Les Pauls are heavy. I am referring to the lighter Les Pauls (8.5 lbs-9.5 lbs) as opposed to the heavier ones (10 lbs +)

          Comment


          • #6
            oh i gotcha. like the flat top pauls

            Comment

            Working...
            X