If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Sharkfins and reverse headstock. Be wary of the 'Firebird inspired' bit -- the current Jackson owners might be a little more reluctant to directly knock off a Gibson body shape than the guys who made the last ones.
Two more and still undecided. I am leaning toward sharkie and standard headstock.
How about the shark eye inlays like on the KV2T and Mark Morton model... maybe just leave out the abalone "eye" to have the two opposing shark fins? Something different.
Crafted with the demands of the discernible player in mind, Jackson guitars give you the shapes, finishes and tones you love. From the venerable Rhoads, Soloist, Warrior and more, shop Jackson for the highest performance.
I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Personally I love trans-black, so as for the color, I think it's a good choice.
I agree that the sharkies are better than the trapezoids, and the normal headstock looks like a better fit to me than reversed.
As for resell value...it is pretty much 100% that you won't break even if you resold something like this, which honestly I'd say is true for pretty much any new Jackson custom shop today (unless you get a great deal). If it's something you really want, screw resell value, we only live once
I think 24 frets instead of 22 would be better, so that it would be different then a gibby in yet another aspect
Thats my opinion, good luck with it!
My name may be Matt, but in no case does that mean I will let you walk all over me
I want to add, I wasn't trying to be snarky...just realistic. I re-read my post and, boy did it come off bad.
When you spend that kind of money...could be up to $4k....you wanna make sure your money is safe just in case you need to move it in the future.
I should have just said it that way the first time!
I think that's good advice. The 80s Jacksons seem to retain value (as a general rule), while the newer ones are never sold to close of what the purchase price was. I often wonder what, let's say, a 2008 RR1 is going to go for when it's 10-15 years old.
Comment