NAMM 2017 Pix!

[roodyrocker]

For those of you without Facebook accounts, Roody invested so much effort and bandwidth into shooting these photos and uploading them to a common source that you still want him to jump through hoops to spoon-feed you his work?

I despise Facebook but even I have a dummy account associated to an e-mail address I never use. It came in handy to view Roody's pics.

It would be so much easier for you entitled folks to sign up for Facebook and view Roody's photos than it would be for Roody to reupload everything elsewhere.

Roody, you have bent over backwards for everyone and delivered a comprehensive series of photos. Please don't cater to the lazy. If they want to see NAMM goodies you have graciously shared with everyone, let them figure it out. It's not difficult.

Its not a problem really. I would actually like to upload higher resolution pix but Facebook limits the size. Besides, Facebook is not all that reliable at uploading lots of pix. I actually had to do them in small batches and a few times it froze and I had to figure out where it left off and try again. Quite annoying but I had nothing else to use.

With flickr app you can set it to automatically upload as you take the pics.
Anyone can view the album and it is all free.
Serves same purpose as FB with bonus that the rest of the population can see them. :=

The cameras I'm using are mainly DSLR with pretty huge files. I think something like Flickr might work with a cell phone but not these cameras. Still, I'm willing to upload them somewhere else as long as its reasonably quick and maintains decent resolution

Rudy

[roodyrocker]

Here is a link to the same pix on Google Drive for those who can't access Facebook:

file://VISUALAUDIOTAB/Users/visualaudio/Google%20Drive/NAMM%202017/Jackson%20Charvel

[sully]

Why would Jackson rip off the Carvin/Keisel "We didn't have enough wood to cover the top." look?

That bevel has been around long before Carvin/Kiesel did it, by a few manufacturers.

While a bevel may not be uncommon, the style in which it was implemented is a huge ripoff of what Kiesel has been doing for a few years. I thought it was unimaginative and uncool. I dug the Jeff Beck seafoam soloist, even if it was dragged behind a truck before it made it to the stand.

Sully

[toejam]

I also think it's a little unimaginative. Also agree on the seafoam Soloist. I'm not much into the relic look, but that is pretty damn cool!

[BenoA]

@toejam great minds think alike!

[jahosy]

Thanks for sharing. Those archtop soloist looks wicked ....

[roodyrocker]

Thanks for sharing. Those archtop soloist looks wicked ....

You're welcome. As soon as I get some time I'll post some other pix. To me, the Jacksons are the most important

[AAEA]

they couldhave had so cooler more risky custom shop stuff for namm 2017 but for the regular guy this 2017 line up is a major win. I might actually buy a new jackson.

[sully]

You're welcome. As soon as I get some time I'll post some other pix. To me, the Jacksons are the most important

There are a few others that I'm looking forward to seeing.

[roodyrocker]

There are a few others that I'm looking forward to seeing.

Yes, Sully Guitars will be up soon

[sully]

Thanks homie! Was nice catching up with you again at the show.

[wilkinsi]

Thanks for sharing the photos Rudy.

Only one Warrior?

[dmoney666]

For those of you without Facebook accounts, Roody invested so much effort and bandwidth into shooting these photos and uploading them to a common source that you still want him to jump through hoops to spoon-feed you his work?

I despise Facebook but even I have a dummy account associated to an e-mail address I never use. It came in handy to view Roody's pics.

It would be so much easier for you entitled folks to sign up for Facebook and view Roody's photos than it would be for Roody to reupload everything elsewhere.

Roody, you have bent over backwards for everyone and delivered a comprehensive series of photos. Please don't cater to the lazy. If they want to see NAMM goodies you have graciously shared with everyone, let them figure it out. It's not difficult.

Um, you DO realize that people can make FB albums public, right? It's not jumping through hoops. It's a simple option to turn on.

[Number Of The Priest]

Um, you DO realize that people can make FB albums public, right? It's not jumping through hoops. It's a simple option to turn on.

Until you came along, nobody seemed to offer the suggestion of making the album public. Admittedly, that is the easier option for Roody. People were suggesting Roody upload the photos AGAIN to a DIFFERENT host like OneDrive, Google Drive, or Flickr. That is a huge effort and a large investment of bandwidth and time. Or maybe it's just me trying to avoid work because I am on limited connection speeds, and photo hosts seem to time out when I try to upload a massive amount of photos simultaneously, forcing me to upload in small batches over several hours. Maybe the rest of the world is on ultra high speed internet with no time-out problems when uploading to Facebook, Photobucket, or Flickr.

[dmoney666]

Until you came along, nobody seemed to offer the suggestion of making the album public. Admittedly, that is the easier option for Roody. People were suggesting Roody upload the photos AGAIN to a DIFFERENT host like OneDrive, Google Drive, or Flickr. That is a huge effort and a large investment of bandwidth and time. Or maybe it's just me trying to avoid work because I am on limited connection speeds, and photo hosts seem to time out when I try to upload a massive amount of photos simultaneously, forcing me to upload in small batches over several hours. Maybe the rest of the world is on ultra high speed internet with no time-out problems when uploading to Facebook, Photobucket, or Flickr.

Oh, I agree with you that asking him to upload to another service is unreasonable.