Hell yes! And as you are all well aware, the extra mass at the headstock helps generate blues-rock chatter.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does anyone else install their strings "backwards? on a Floyd?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Snoogans View PostHell yes! And as you are all well aware, the extra mass at the headstock helps generate blues-rock chatter."clean sounds are for pussies" - Axewielder
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gartron View PostI couldn't go across to this method as I like to leave my strings uncut at the headstock, cos as we all know it gives added sustain..as well as looking bad ass ...."clean sounds are for pussies" - Axewielder
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Rocks View PostI don't do it for two reasons:
1) I don't like the fact that the wound ends need to bend around the post
2) I would rather pull a certain amount of string through the post to get the amount of wraps to be the same (or close)"clean sounds are for pussies" - Axewielder
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Rocks View Post2) I would rather pull a certain amount of string through the post to get the amount of wraps to be the same (or close)Last edited by Scooter; 02-14-2012, 02:01 AM."illegal downloading saved people from having to buy that piece of shit you tried to pass off as music" - Nighbat
Comment
-
I think it is a technique of stringing that was invented by some aging ex-rock star somewhere so he wouldn't stratch the headstock and devalue his only asset whilst he was suffering the DT's. It was probably quite successful, until he climbed back on the wagon and proceeded to fall down the stairs and snap the thing in two.You can't really be jealous of something you can't fathom.
Comment
-
I always thought it looked a little retarded. I tried it once or twice to see how it would be, but I just went back to the normal way. Anyway, after learning on and playing Floyded guitars for many years, all I have now are guitars with fixed bridges!I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Comment
Comment