Trying to wrap my head around something here.
Say you have a 12"-16" compound radius fretboard. The radius at the nut is 12" and the radius at the butt is 16". This forms a "wood cone" shape. This is the way I understand it.
Therefore, because the saddles are beyond this 12"-16" wood cone, the bridge/saddle radius should be set even larger (flatter), like 18" or 20"? (I haven't done the math but I suspect this is why understring radius gauge sets include gauges up to a very flat 20".
If you set the saddles to be 16", you are decreasing the radius of the strings at the 22nd/24th fret. The strings at the 22nd or 24th fret will have a radius between 12" and 16", while the wood and frets will be 16". A mismatch.
Thoughts?
Or have I got it all wrong and the fretboard is carved in such a way to reflect a 12"-16" nut-to-saddle cone?
Say you have a 12"-16" compound radius fretboard. The radius at the nut is 12" and the radius at the butt is 16". This forms a "wood cone" shape. This is the way I understand it.
Therefore, because the saddles are beyond this 12"-16" wood cone, the bridge/saddle radius should be set even larger (flatter), like 18" or 20"? (I haven't done the math but I suspect this is why understring radius gauge sets include gauges up to a very flat 20".
If you set the saddles to be 16", you are decreasing the radius of the strings at the 22nd/24th fret. The strings at the 22nd or 24th fret will have a radius between 12" and 16", while the wood and frets will be 16". A mismatch.
Thoughts?
Or have I got it all wrong and the fretboard is carved in such a way to reflect a 12"-16" nut-to-saddle cone?
Comment