OK, so I understand that angled headstocks help keep the strings in the nut slots. So...why do Floyd guitars tend to have them (where they really don't provide any benefit) and non-locking nut guitars tend to not have them?!? Inquiring minds want to know. The reason for the question is these dang angled headstocks increase the likelihood of broken headstocks when dropped (which has happened to me ).
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Angled headstocks
Collapse
X
-
Some angled headstock guitars have string trees like the ESP Kamikaze IV and is not necessary. Most tilt headstock guitars do not have string tree's only straight ones, like Charvel Strathead or Fender guitars. In most cases the angled headstocks are stronger, especially the Jacksons because of the scarf joint, glued headtock.Tone is like Art: Your opinion is valid. Listen, learn, have fun, draw your own conclusions.
Comment
-
Floyd nuts are slanted, so as vertigo said, when you tighten the nut the strings would go sharp unless you had a string retainer/tree or an angled head.I want to depart this world the same way I arrived; screaming and covered in someone else's blood
The most human thing we can do is comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.
My Blog: http://newcenstein.com
Comment
-
A non locking nut needs a string angle from 11 to 17 degrees. Keeps the strings in the slots with enough down pressure to not rattle in the slot etc...
A strat head, the closer tuners provide the necessary angle, but the farthest tuners are not steep enough- hence the string trees.
You already saw the posts about the locking nut......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Newc View PostFloyd nuts are slanted, so as vertigo said, when you tighten the nut the strings would go sharp unless you had a string retainer/tree or an angled head._________________________________________________
"Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
- Ken M
Comment
Comment