Which active EMG is the passive HZ humbucker designed to emulate? 60? 81? 89? Other? If I am to upgrade to actives, I want to keep the sound at least near as dammit to the HZ as possible. That may sound strange to some, but I don't like spending ages reprogramming my Boss GT-8, like I had to when I used an SD-loaded KE3 after all my patches were constructed with my WRMG. The idea is to retain as much of the original tone, but produce a higher output without distorting the signal as would be the case with the Turbocharger. Comments?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
EMG-HZ: active equivelent?
Collapse
X
-
Honestly, if you dont want the sound to change, why bother upgrading to the actives? If you like how it sounds now, then actives WILL change the sound... usually for the better, but again, I say if youre happy with it then leave well enough alone!Imagine, being able to be magically whisked away to... Delaware. Hi... Im in... Delaware...
-
Originally posted by wilkinsi View PostWhich active EMG is the passive HZ humbucker designed to emulate? 60? 81? 89? Other? If I am to upgrade to actives, I want to keep the sound at least near as dammit to the HZ as possible. That may sound strange to some, but I don't like spending ages reprogramming my Boss GT-8, like I had to when I used an SD-loaded KE3 after all my patches were constructed with my WRMG. The idea is to retain as much of the original tone, but produce a higher output without distorting the signal as would be the case with the Turbocharger. Comments?
That said, in the GT-8, you can change the "input" decibel level. it will affect all the patches. if you modelled all patches with a active pup and want to switch to a passive, you can increase the input decibel level and vice versa.Sam
Comment
Comment