On the DKMG (2006 Archtop) i just acquired i have noticed that the top E string is significantly closer to the edge of the fretboard than the bottom E is.
Comparing this to my 92 Dinky AR, the Top and bottom strings are of equal distance to the edge of the fret board (as i would expect).
Is this an issue? The first thing i notice is the E slips off the bottom far more easily than the on the AR. It almost seems as if the neck needs to be be loosened and just edged slightly over (where the seems to be a small gap) in the neck joint.
The guitar is barely used and effectively new and my luthier will be setting it up and possibly levelling the frets down (as it's new) but i wanted to get some other oppinions on this as it isn't like that on my other Jackson.
Thanks.
PS: the DLMG is nice but f*ck me is my neck thin on the 92 Dinky AR...thinner than the DKMG - anyone know any new jacksons that have the thinnest necks?
Comparing this to my 92 Dinky AR, the Top and bottom strings are of equal distance to the edge of the fret board (as i would expect).
Is this an issue? The first thing i notice is the E slips off the bottom far more easily than the on the AR. It almost seems as if the neck needs to be be loosened and just edged slightly over (where the seems to be a small gap) in the neck joint.
The guitar is barely used and effectively new and my luthier will be setting it up and possibly levelling the frets down (as it's new) but i wanted to get some other oppinions on this as it isn't like that on my other Jackson.
Thanks.
PS: the DLMG is nice but f*ck me is my neck thin on the 92 Dinky AR...thinner than the DKMG - anyone know any new jacksons that have the thinnest necks?
Comment