Originally posted by Nazgul
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Well, I think the EMGs are history.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by zeegler View PostWell, I had told Freddy to install the 85 in the bridge position. I just checked, and he did. I don't get it, they really sound bad. There must be something wrong. There is no way Zakk Wylde, Slayer, Metallica, and others use these things like this. Something is definitely wrong.
If all your wiring is fine and everything else, maybe EMGs just aren't for you.I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Comment
-
Maybe you have them hooked up wrong do you have 25 k pots. I've found that pickups are just small part of what make a guitar sound good. What condition is your amp in is it tube or SS? Cables ect. Or it might be the player???? I love EMG and they do sound different in each guitar.
Comment
-
zeegs, installing a custom and a 59 would be a fantastic idea!
sully
Comment
-
Originally posted by sully View Postzeegs, installing a custom and a 59 would be a fantastic idea!
sully
This should do the trick. I just have to get a 59 for the neck. This kinda works out good, because I already have a couple of Budman rings for regular pickups, so I don't have to get EMG rings from him after all.
Oh and thanks to whoever edited my thread title. Was that you Sully?
Comment
-
EMG's aren't for everyone..most..but not all..haha
ok totally uncalled for but i like "yo momma" jokes
Originally posted by Freyr View PostEver since I got my Q-Tuners... I don't think I'll ever go back to EMG's. Haha, I can't believe I thought EMG's where high output"It wasn't the world being round that agitated people, but that the world wasn't flat. [ ... ]
The truth will seem utterly preposterous, and its speaker, a raving lunatic."
Comment
-
I just did the 81 to the neck and 85 to the bridge swap in my DKMG and I like the 85 where its at but the 81 sucks in the neck IMO very woofy sounding no matter where I set it maybe I'll try a 60 in the neck I think I have one in the pickup bin.Really? well screw Mark Twain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by delt View PostYeah, so how are those Q-tip hol....uh i mean Q-tuners? You posted a thread about them a few days ago (and yeah, you could fit a q-tip in each hole )
I'm still trying them against other pups to get an accurate review... I hate people who get new stuff and post reviews of it two days later... who knows how the hell it works down the road
But, they sound way better then the 18v 89/81 or 81/81 or 85/81 or 81/85 or 9v 81/81 or 81/85 combo's I had in my guitar thoughout the various stages. The pull on the strings like a sun-of-a-bitch though.
Comment
-
Zeegler, did you consider that it may be the guitar itself responsible for the thin sound? That thing is maple neck thru, the groups that you've defined the sound of emg's use mahogany body guitars. I have esp explorers with emg 81s and 60s and believe me they are not tinny nor metallic sounding.
You may want to try gibson's ceramic pickups as well, they're very high output pickups and have a good bottom end punch as well.
Comment
-
It's not because of his guitar. I've run EMGs in *everything* at one point, and a maple neck-through does not automatically make them sound tinny. Something must be up with the wiring, like the pickups not getting full juice out of the battery, or they are accidentally wired out of phase.
Other than that - play around with the amp settings. EMGs easilly nail the MOP/Justice era Metallica sound with the mids scooped, and Slayer's sound with the mids bumped. Zakk's sound is a different thing altogether, and is not easy to emulate through pickups and amps alone.
Comment
-
Well, it's too late, they're sold.
I just don't have the patience to mess around with them. It's pretty much guaranteed that a Duncan Custom will sound better anyway, and there's the added bonus of never having to worry about batteries.
Comment
Comment