Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

And away we go NHL thread!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fell on my face on that one, but it was endrik who threw the initial whammy.
    Not helping the situation since 1965!

    Comment


    • not to mention the Sharks are natural tankers, they might just get a little too cozy now and fukk things up for themselves.
      Not helping the situation since 1965!

      Comment


      • what's with you and the Sharks? do the locals even play hockey over there? I've been in Bay Area only one day so I don't know about their hockey.
        "There is nothing more fearful than imagination without taste" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

        "To be stupid, selfish and have good health are three requirements for happiness, though if stupidity is lacking, all is lost" - Gustave Flaubert

        Comment


        • Originally posted by atomic charvel guy View Post
          not to mention the Sharks are natural tankers, they might just get a little too cozy now and fukk things up for themselves.
          Detroit should have won that last game. That was a 'must win' and they had a nice lead and lost it. Pretty bad. To go from winning the Cup to last year losing it in a lacklustre game 7 (after that amazing game 6 performance) to fighting to even get in the playoffs this year...Detroit which used to be very dependable has become very unpredictable.
          My Duncan Designed pickups are way better than Seymour Duncan regular pickups you fanboy.

          Yeah...too bad the forum doesn't have a minimum IQ.

          Comment


          • c'mon, they're all "must" wins as far as i'm concerned.
            The Wings couldn't put a whole team on the ice for most of this season, I don't expect them to go away anytime soon.
            As far as next season goes anyway. They'll be back regardless.
            Not helping the situation since 1965!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Endrik View Post
              what's with you and the Sharks? do the locals even play hockey over there? I've been in Bay Area only one day so I don't know about their hockey.
              why don't you ask the Sharks? they're the ones who have underachieved. I'm going off of their track record.
              Not helping the situation since 1965!

              Comment


              • I'm going to send the Flyers instructions on performing the Heimlich Maneuver.
                Scott

                Comment


                • chicago up 2-0, back to the bettman rules... bullshit call on buff, and refs in between bolland and sedin. Wont let them go, even tho they both would. Bolland wouldve destroyed sedin. lol.
                  Its a complete catastrophe. But Im a professional, I can rise above it. LOL

                  Comment


                  • grin and bare it Cliff, grin and bare it. Much better for the blood pressure lol
                    shawnlutz.com

                    Comment


                    • More bettman rules. Buff gets punched in the face, yet gets a penalty. Surprisingly, the nucks are down a goal with 15 to play? lmfao.
                      Its a complete catastrophe. But Im a professional, I can rise above it. LOL

                      Comment


                      • Byfugly got a penalty for being a jackass after a ref had warned him to settle down a couple shifts earlier. It happens to every team. The Canucks looked out of sorts tonight. Lots of bad bounces where the puck was just hopping over sticks and the Chicago bounces seemed to always end up flat and ready to shoot. Hopefully the Canucks will shake it off and come back with a better effort on Friday. Nietti didn't really have to make any hard saves in this game. The refs are apparently letting goaltender contact go here and Vancouver can't complain about it unless they are being penalized for it if Chicago isn't.
                        GTWGITS! - RacerX

                        Comment


                        • I actually thought the Vancouver came up on the short end of the Ref's stick...Burrows being sngled out and only one to the box and "the big man on a terror's" goal was goaltender interference. I know it that was Tomas Holmstrom that would have been disallowed lol
                          shawnlutz.com

                          Comment


                          • Yeah that last goal prob shouldnt have counted. I think the only reason it did is bc it went off edlers skate. Honestly, if I was a player i would be so irritated right now, i dont think anyone knows what a penalty is anymore. Just seems the refs miss blatant calls and just call random b.s.
                            Its a complete catastrophe. But Im a professional, I can rise above it. LOL

                            Comment


                            • it was the contact by Kane and Byfuglien which should have been goaltender interference and that isnt reviewable. The puck went in the net fine but that was just a missed call by the refs. You can't have contact with a netminder in the crease and neither were really pushed into BobbyLou. All water under the bridge as the game was already over imho...
                              shawnlutz.com

                              Comment


                              • Yeah the game was already decided by that point but the refs seem to be ignoring goaltender contact. If the refs aren't calling it, you have to be willing to go there too and it looks like the Canucks weren't for some reason. Friday's game should really decide the momentum of the series.
                                GTWGITS! - RacerX

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X