I thought he should have been suspended myself and in all honesty I never heard of the "behind the net area" mentioned in any discussions of the blindside rule until this morning when Bob McKenzie mentioned it in his blog. I tend to think I'm farily on the up on rules and whatnot. I don't want the NHL turning in the NoHitLeague but that was about as blindside as it goes and shows great lack of respect on Torres part. He easily could have taken possession of the puck instead of going for the big hit. Even with the made up "free for all" zone behind the net the head was targeted and that has nothing to do with the blindside rule.
What is sad is if Seabrook laid on the ice and or got carried off he ice then they would have given him a major and a game.
I played the game when this was a good hit and lived by hold your head up or it will be taken off rule. I've taken them and gave them out. I have no problem with it but when there are new rules put in place to eliminate concussions the rules should be enforced. Even Carry Fraizer said he should be suspended. Last year that was a good hit, this year its not...
If I was coach Q, the green light is on to take out Torres....
What is sad is if Seabrook laid on the ice and or got carried off he ice then they would have given him a major and a game.
I played the game when this was a good hit and lived by hold your head up or it will be taken off rule. I've taken them and gave them out. I have no problem with it but when there are new rules put in place to eliminate concussions the rules should be enforced. Even Carry Fraizer said he should be suspended. Last year that was a good hit, this year its not...
If I was coach Q, the green light is on to take out Torres....
Comment