If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
There are actually three words here. The simple one is the big growly creature (unless you prefer the Winnie-the-Pooh type). Hardly anyone past the age of ten gets that one wrong. The problem is the other two. Stevedores bear burdens on their backs and mothers bear children. Both mean “carry” (in the case of mothers, the meaning has been extended from carrying the child during pregnancy to actually giving birth). But strippers bare their bodies—sometimes bare-naked. The confusion between this latter verb and “bear” creates many unintentionally amusing sentences; so if you want to entertain your readers while convincing them that you are ...., by all means mix them up. “Bear with me,” the standard expression, is a request for forbearance or patience.
“Bare with me” would be an invitation to undress. “Bare” has an adjectival form: “The pioneers stripped the forest bare.”
The exception to the general rule that one should use an apostrophe to indicate possession is in possessive pronouns. Some of them are not a problem. “Mine” has no misleading “s” at the end to invite an apostrophe. And few people are tempted to write “hi’s,” though the equally erroneous “her’s” is fairly common, as are “our’s” and “their’s”—all wrong, wrong, wrong. The problem with avoiding “it’s” as a possessive is that this spelling is perfectly correct as a contraction meaning “it is.” Just remember one point and you’ll never make this mistake again: “it’s” always means “it is” or “it has” and nothing else.
I was taught to always read out contractions to make sure they make sense. For example, the incorrect (but increasingly common) "we couldn't find it's owner" you would say "we could not find it is owner" - the could not is correct, the it is... is not
One that always irks me is when people say could of, should of or would of. OF does not make sense in this context! It's could have, should have or would have. It can also be used as a contraction; could've, should've or would've.
I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
I love Ron's line here. On its own, it's like a Faith No More song or something. See how I used both 'its and it's' in that sentence. Please continue gentlemen.
One that always irks me is when people say could of, should of or would of. OF does not make sense in this context! It's could have, should have or would have. It can also be used as a contraction; could've, should've or would've.
YES! I knew that was on your list, Joe! The problem arises because the word of is pronounced uv; and when you sound out the contacted 've it is exactly the same pronunciation. My theory is that the folks who spell it that way either
-don't read printed matter like books, magazines or newspapers, where editors check all this before publishing
-are of the younger generation and the "could of" bit is all over the internet
-just shorten it rather than hunt down that "/' key next to the Enter key
I usually don't care how anyone writes, as long as I can figure out what the hell they're trying to say, but apostrophes used before the s in plurals do grate on me. One of my pre-schooler's teachers does it in her emails, and if she was his kindergarten or first grade teacher I'd be down there making sure she cut it out. Lots of folks here do it with Jackson's and Charvel's.
Comment