Ok, so my employer makes these vehicle parts which are primarily designed to go on the bottom of large, heavy-duty trucks and freight trains, and we ship them to India.
The customer in India has requested that the parts we send to them must not have any visible cosmetic flaws. Period.
Now, these parts are made of steel, and steel will always have some inherent cosmetic flaws such as light scratches from tooling/processing/milling, as well as small pits. Our rigorous testing over the last few decades has proven time and again these cosmetic flaws in no way negatively affect the performance of the product, yet they want only "perfect" parts, which costs us far more money than it should as we have to reject an entire 3 to 4-ton coil of steel if it is found to have these minor issues (or at least set it aside for use on another customer's order, who has never complained about such issues because they understand it doesn't affect performance).
We've also had to completely scrap completed parts the customer rejected merely due to these minor cosmetic flaws.
Now, before anyone says "if I spent $3K on a Les Paul/Jackson/Fender/PRS/etc it better be damn spotless and perfect", let me remind you these things go on the bottom of large OTR vehicles (18 wheelers, etc). We don't get complaints from our European or South American or even Pacific Rim customers, because they also understand it's going on the bottom of a vehicle. It's not the hood ornament, it's not going in the passenger compartment, and it's not a wedding present.
The U.S. Military doesn't deem these as unfit for use in war wagons, either. If they're good enough for the Marines, they're good enough for everyone else. Volvo doesn't complain, nor Scania, nor Mercedes-Benz, nor did Cadillac or Lincoln when we supplied them, nor do our railroad customers.
So what the fuck is up with India?
The customer in India has requested that the parts we send to them must not have any visible cosmetic flaws. Period.
Now, these parts are made of steel, and steel will always have some inherent cosmetic flaws such as light scratches from tooling/processing/milling, as well as small pits. Our rigorous testing over the last few decades has proven time and again these cosmetic flaws in no way negatively affect the performance of the product, yet they want only "perfect" parts, which costs us far more money than it should as we have to reject an entire 3 to 4-ton coil of steel if it is found to have these minor issues (or at least set it aside for use on another customer's order, who has never complained about such issues because they understand it doesn't affect performance).
We've also had to completely scrap completed parts the customer rejected merely due to these minor cosmetic flaws.
Now, before anyone says "if I spent $3K on a Les Paul/Jackson/Fender/PRS/etc it better be damn spotless and perfect", let me remind you these things go on the bottom of large OTR vehicles (18 wheelers, etc). We don't get complaints from our European or South American or even Pacific Rim customers, because they also understand it's going on the bottom of a vehicle. It's not the hood ornament, it's not going in the passenger compartment, and it's not a wedding present.
The U.S. Military doesn't deem these as unfit for use in war wagons, either. If they're good enough for the Marines, they're good enough for everyone else. Volvo doesn't complain, nor Scania, nor Mercedes-Benz, nor did Cadillac or Lincoln when we supplied them, nor do our railroad customers.
So what the fuck is up with India?
Comment