Originally posted by Cygnus X1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Muscle Cars!
Collapse
X
-
I live on the edge of danger facing life and death every single day.....then I leave her at home and go disarm bombs.
-
I'm getting a bit envious and anxious. Another Jag forum member is doing mostly the same upgrades I am and just posted update pictures today, except he's about 3 months ahead of me. But he opted to do the SC first and the LSD later... I wanted the LSD in before the SC upgrade. My top end will look identical to this... upgraded 75mm intake and Kenne Bell twin screw replacing the Easton roots-type:
A guy-thing of beauty
FWIW, this is the first time I've ever done any serious intake mods to any vehicle... and I've owned a whole slew of muscle cars since I started driving in 1983.
And yeah, I know my XKR isn't exactly a muscle car... but it is a true GT to it's soon to be 560bhp heart and 20+psi soul. ;D
Last edited by xenophobe; 02-18-2013, 05:31 PM.The 2nd Amendment: America's Original Homeland Defense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bombtek View PostI had 1970 in Blue with black striping. Didn't come with the 351C motor though. Mine was bone stock with a 351W. I've had both the C and the W and IMO he C took too long to spin up, where as the W, you just hammered the gas pedal and it was INSTANT. Either throw your head back nearly snapping your neck or tires lose grip and keep spinning till either they blow or you let off the gas. lol
Actually the 2BBL Cleveland was a little quicker than the Windsor IMO.
Problem with the 4BBL was both the damn dual point ignition and the set-point for the vacuum secondary flooding out
right when you need the kick.
An MSD on the '73 and a cheaper Mallory on the '71 solved the ignition issues.
Just adjusting the secondary on the '71 solved a lot of issues, but yes still a bit "boggy".
The Cleveland heads were "semi-hemi" and under aspirated for the volume potential.
IIRC the stock 4BBL carbs were only 550 CFM, or less.Last edited by Cygnus X1; 02-18-2013, 05:35 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cygnus X1 View PostHeh, THANKS, someone with some experience.
Actually the 2BBL Cleveland was a little quicker than the Windsor IMO.
Problem with the 4BBL was both the damn dual point ignition and the set-point for the vacuum secondary flooding out
right when you need the kick.
An MSD on the '73 and a cheaper Mallory on the '71 solved the ignition issues.
Just adjusting the secondary on the '71 solved a lot of issues, but yes still a bit "boggy".
The Cleveland heads were "semi-hemi" and under aspirated for the volume potential.
IIRC the stock 4BBL carbs were only 550 CFM, or less.Rudy
www.metalinc.net
Comment
-
Originally posted by axmann View PostA 70' hemi Challenger? That clean? I'm done before I posted. Beautiful.Rudy
www.metalinc.net
Comment
-
I had a 70 383 Challenger great car it was my first car that had air conditioning.
Red with a black vinyl top/black interior slap stick shifter.Had the wider rally wheels too.
Dual exhaust just like the R/T's.
My brothers wife had a 70 electric blue 340 Challenger flat hood and small V8 badges on the side.Pretty much a sleeper.Really? well screw Mark Twain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cygnus X1 View PostHeh, THANKS, someone with some experience.
Actually the 2BBL Cleveland was a little quicker than the Windsor IMO.
Problem with the 4BBL was both the damn dual point ignition and the set-point for the vacuum secondary flooding out
right when you need the kick.
An MSD on the '73 and a cheaper Mallory on the '71 solved the ignition issues.
Just adjusting the secondary on the '71 solved a lot of issues, but yes still a bit "boggy".
The Cleveland heads were "semi-hemi" and under aspirated for the volume potential.
IIRC the stock 4BBL carbs were only 550 CFM, or less.I live on the edge of danger facing life and death every single day.....then I leave her at home and go disarm bombs.
Comment
-
Not a "muscle car" but does have muscle car engine.
When I drive this around I pretend I'm some rich doctor in 1961.
Comment
-
My wife and I both have a "thing" for 67' Mustangs.
This is a before and after shot.
Before.... rough 67 with a burnt 289 and lots of "aging".
After... same 67 with a new 302 ported 20 over, disc brakes, suspension (F and R), 3:83 rear end, all new interior, gauges, dash, tranny... I think the only original parts left was the actual body itself.
Bumpers and front clip were new as well.
Painted it Anniversary green with a Palomino colored top. Some ass fuck stole the original hubcaps. Took forever to find them too.
Should have never sold it.Last edited by rjohnstone; 02-19-2013, 06:02 PM.-Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by bombtek View PostMaybe its just cuzza nostalgia, but I will always favor the Windsor over the Cleveland lol.
On a related note I've flipped Ford/Chevy so many different times I can't count.
Doesn't make a whole lot of difference to me.
Except the price of the parts.
That's about the only reason I go old Chevy now.
I don't have much to spend (obviously) on cars.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cygnus X1 View PostI completely understand!
On a related note I've flipped Ford/Chevy so many different times I can't count.
Doesn't make a whole lot of difference to me.
Except the price of the parts.
That's about the only reason I go old Chevy now.
I don't have much to spend (obviously) on cars.Rudy
www.metalinc.net
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nimitz View Post
Not a "muscle car" but does have muscle car engine.
When I drive this around I pretend I'm some rich doctor in 1961.Rudy
www.metalinc.net
Comment
-
Some cool stuff posted so far!
Never had the money or space to run Yankee iron, (I have a Civic) but I've always loved 'em. I reckon it was all the cop shows we had on the TV in the 70s!
A good friend of mine has had a few Mustangs, and is currently running this shy and retiring '69...
Comment
Comment