Re: Van Halen Sues Oreos
[ QUOTE ]
I say learn those solos note-for-note, then write even ONE song with a better solo than any of Ed's, and then maybe you can critique
the guy's soloing ability.
I'd say every solo on the first 4 albums was classic and creative. If they don't make sense to you, maybe you're not analyzing them
to see the form and structure that's there.
If you simply don't like his solos, that's your prerogative. To say he's not a lead guitarist, it sounds like you think you're better. Do you?
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't need to learn his "solos" to "earn the priveledge" of pointing out his lack of melodic focus. How hard is it to compose a solo that compliments not only his own rhythm patterns, but also the lyrical melody?
And do I think I'm better? From what I've heard of both myself and EVH's playing, I'd say I have a better ear for melody than he does, or at least better than what he's put out. I'm all for individual interpretation, but you can listen to something like Frank Zappa and tell that even though he's way outside the melody of the song (if it has one), he's in total control of it. EVH sounds like he was TRYING to sound like he was doing it on purpose to sound "out", when in fact it sounds more like "ok, here's the solo, lemme just do a bunch of quick fills and some tapping and some whammy barring and a few more scalar fills and then get back to the rhythm"
Come on guys, stop looking at it like it's 1978 and you just saw or heard Eruption for the first time. Yeah it was flashy and cool for the day because the others who were doing it (Blackmore) weren't as heavily advertised, but this is 2004 - time to face the facts that all EVH had (or showed) for the guitar world was flash and bang, not musical ability.
You guys explain it to me then - how exactly did EVH become such a Guitar God?
Newc
[ QUOTE ]
I say learn those solos note-for-note, then write even ONE song with a better solo than any of Ed's, and then maybe you can critique
the guy's soloing ability.
I'd say every solo on the first 4 albums was classic and creative. If they don't make sense to you, maybe you're not analyzing them
to see the form and structure that's there.
If you simply don't like his solos, that's your prerogative. To say he's not a lead guitarist, it sounds like you think you're better. Do you?
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't need to learn his "solos" to "earn the priveledge" of pointing out his lack of melodic focus. How hard is it to compose a solo that compliments not only his own rhythm patterns, but also the lyrical melody?
And do I think I'm better? From what I've heard of both myself and EVH's playing, I'd say I have a better ear for melody than he does, or at least better than what he's put out. I'm all for individual interpretation, but you can listen to something like Frank Zappa and tell that even though he's way outside the melody of the song (if it has one), he's in total control of it. EVH sounds like he was TRYING to sound like he was doing it on purpose to sound "out", when in fact it sounds more like "ok, here's the solo, lemme just do a bunch of quick fills and some tapping and some whammy barring and a few more scalar fills and then get back to the rhythm"
Come on guys, stop looking at it like it's 1978 and you just saw or heard Eruption for the first time. Yeah it was flashy and cool for the day because the others who were doing it (Blackmore) weren't as heavily advertised, but this is 2004 - time to face the facts that all EVH had (or showed) for the guitar world was flash and bang, not musical ability.
You guys explain it to me then - how exactly did EVH become such a Guitar God?
Newc
Comment