Had a discussion at work about who was/is better The Beatles or The Rolling Stones. I never really thought about it before, but man it got passionate. So I figured this is a good as any place to get a read on the subject.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
who's your preference...
Collapse
X
-
Re: who\'s your preference...
Stones. Better musicians, more rock and roll and still with us...which is amazing.
Beatles were better song writers and better producers.
Very different flavors.
MikeSleep. The sound doesn't collapse to riffs of early eyes either.
Comment
-
Re: who\'s your preference...
I'm just can't get into the Beatles at all, apart from a few notable songs (daytripper, ticket to ride etc), so I went for the Stones....Popular is not the same as good
Rare is not the same as valuable
Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get
Comment
-
Re: who\'s your preference...
I picked The Stones as my preference. I don't listen to either group anymore, but back in the day I had a bitchin' Stones LP collection. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]Scott
Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong.
Comment
-
Re: who\'s your preference...
The Stones were the bad boys an the Beatles were more teeny bopper in the beginning. I love Beatles tunes, but my hippie brothers turned me into Brian Jones when I was 4 years old. I have the Lips and tongue on my right arm. Big and Bold.Not helping the situation since 1965!
Comment
Comment