who's your preference...

[Soap]

Re: who\'s your preference...

[ QUOTE ]
Cant really stand either, but if I had to choose Id have to go with the Stones.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yep, me too.
I'm just not a fan or listener of both.
When a song of either one comes on the radio I find another channel/station. I feel the same way about John Mellencamp.
Its mostly that type of music (very radioish/pop rock, top 40 sound), it never appealed or worked for me.

[zeegler]

Re: who\'s your preference...

The Who!

[Soap]

Re: who\'s your preference...

[ QUOTE ]
The Who!

[/ QUOTE ]
There ya go, I can listen to the Who before I do/would the stones or beatles anyday.
The Who, to me, had an edgier sound.

[donf]

Re: who\'s your preference...

I like the Stones, but gotta take the Beatles. It's nice to hear a lot of ideas from one group. Most of todays groups...............if you heard one of their songs, you heard the rest. [img]/images/graemlins/eyes.gif[/img]

[jim777]

Re: who\'s your preference...

I hate the stones. A few good songs back when Brian Jones was alive but nothing worthwhile since then. Every other time they make the papers it's because they're suing someone. God, I hate the stones! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[skorb]

Re: who\'s your preference...

[ QUOTE ]
stones...gotta love that fuck you image

[/ QUOTE ]
+1

and they lived it too! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[GodOfRhythm]

Re: who\'s your preference...

The stones only got popular because a large group of non-conformist, 'angry' emo kids wanted to react against the entire beatlescraze.

[ApeDosMil]

Re: who\'s your preference...

Beatles are too cheesy for me, I don't like love songs to much.

[skins]

Re: who\'s your preference...

if zep were there then i would go for them

[Ace]

Re: who\'s your preference...

Beatles. The Stones have a few good songs, but The Beatles changed music forever... Not the pop "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" Beatles, but the amazing well written up-beat "We Can Work It Out" bluesy "Why Don't We Do It In The Road" Beatles...

[Newc]

Re: who\'s your preference...

Mick can't sing, neither can Ringo. However, there were 3 very good singers in the Beatles, and not one good one in the Stones.

I like both though [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[toejam]

Re: who\'s your preference...

[ QUOTE ]
if zep were there then i would go for them

[/ QUOTE ]
Same here! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[atomic charvel guy]

Re: who\'s your preference...

The Stones are so fucking good it's sickening. They have a lot more than just a few good tunes. C'mon.

[thurston]

Re: who\'s your preference...

[ QUOTE ]
The Stones are so fucking good it's sickening. They have a lot more than just a few good tunes. C'mon.

[/ QUOTE ]

+1,000,000,0000
[img]/images/graemlins/headbang.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/headbang.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/headbang.gif[/img]

[atomic charvel guy]

Re: who\'s your preference...

Thankyou Thurst. We're only talking about one of the most prolific writing teams in the history of music. I hope I can get up out of bed and make it to the bathroom before I shit myself when I'm their age. They just won't go away and that's fine with me.