I was raised Lutheran, went to Lutheran schools until college, and still define myself as Lutheran. However, I've found myself caring less and less about the debate over the Earth's creation. And here is why:
The Bible is the account of *human* history on *Earth* and mankind's relationship with God. I'm one of those "nut jobs" who believes in intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, and find it absurd to limit such countless possibilities through our very incomplete historical accounts and scientific theories. It has already been proven that long-held scientific "explanations" about the requirements for sustaining life has we know it do NOT hold up when observing various creatures living deep in the ocean. How could human notions, limited to our immediate surroundings and recorded experiences, hope to explain the mysteries of the universe? Imposing human limitations and "requirements" on things we haven't even discovered yet - including God or the higher power(s) of your choice - is the ultimate in human arrogance IMHO.
Two events strike me as being deal-breakers when trying to explain the extinction of various species, and possibly geological formations also: the flood (Bible account) and the scientific findings suggesting one or more major comet/meteor collisions with Earth. Those are starting points for a whole new discussion, but if the human race was extremely centralized from Adam's time to Noah's (even allowing for other civilizations branching off during that time), many things could have happened elsewhere on Earth during those thousands of years without affecting human existence.
The Bible is the account of *human* history on *Earth* and mankind's relationship with God. I'm one of those "nut jobs" who believes in intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, and find it absurd to limit such countless possibilities through our very incomplete historical accounts and scientific theories. It has already been proven that long-held scientific "explanations" about the requirements for sustaining life has we know it do NOT hold up when observing various creatures living deep in the ocean. How could human notions, limited to our immediate surroundings and recorded experiences, hope to explain the mysteries of the universe? Imposing human limitations and "requirements" on things we haven't even discovered yet - including God or the higher power(s) of your choice - is the ultimate in human arrogance IMHO.
Two events strike me as being deal-breakers when trying to explain the extinction of various species, and possibly geological formations also: the flood (Bible account) and the scientific findings suggesting one or more major comet/meteor collisions with Earth. Those are starting points for a whole new discussion, but if the human race was extremely centralized from Adam's time to Noah's (even allowing for other civilizations branching off during that time), many things could have happened elsewhere on Earth during those thousands of years without affecting human existence.
Comment