If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If the wife and I were going to have a son Jackson was in the front running as at least one of his names(1st or middle). Her grand father was named Jackson so for us it would have been a family thing.
When the kid is born, look for a trem arm. Otherwise, if it's a fixed bridge that will cause you nothing but grief for 18 years.:ROTF: :ROTF: :ROTF: That was pretty good.
Jackson has been used in the Southern United States for ages. Usually was a rich, classy southern boy. So it is definitely an acceptable first or second name for a boy. Now if you have a girl and give her the first name Jackson that might raise questions. But she could always go by Jackie or something.
Do the "Family" name thing like me and my wife did.:ROTF: We got a book of names. We decided on Keith Garrett Rogers. There is no "Keith" in my family. The only "Garrett" is a cousin that didn't even cross our minds. "Rogers" is for real. Or,you could do what my hippie sister did 27 years ago. Her last name is "Rogers". The dad's. "Longo". So she did the natural thing, she used to think eating red clay was hip, and named her out of wedlock daughter, "Holly Clovis".
Comment