A friend of mine plays drums in a band that recently signed on with a management agency and quickly booked shows in California and Mexico, plus at least one festival here in the US and another in Europe. They've done some very successful support gigs for bigger touring acts too. Basically, they're doing a lot of the stuff that I *wish* my band was doing.
Due to family obligations (terminally ill parent) their lead guitarist has left the band. The guitarists handled all the vocals, so with one guy gone, they are reduced to a three-piece and are much more limited in what songs they can do live. On Friday night, they approached me about taking over on lead guitar. I'm flattered that they would ask, would love the opportunity to travel without having to tour non-stop, and could probably pick up the material fairly quickly. I probably wouldn't be in a position to jump right in and do the California/Mexico dates due to Under Eden's recording schedule, and it's more of a traditional heavy metal style that I'm not all that interested in, but I would be able to play solos the way I want and not have to do vocals.
But of course there is a negative, and even though it seems stupid, I can't get past it. I can't get "fired up" about doing all this stuff with another band when my band (playing songs that I wrote) has an EP being mixed and hopefully will have a full-length out before the end of 2008. I feel like this is the kind of stuff that MY band should be doing, even though it's not realistic with the obligations of the other members due to jobs and college. I wouldn't mind doing a couple of one-off festival dates or something, but that isn't really helping out the other band. It's not so much a matter of turning them down as it is a bit of a wake-up call that my own band isn't providing me with those opportunities.
Short version: play music that I care about but might never get to play beyond the local/regional level VS. play someone else's songs (that I don't really care much about) in places that I'd otherwise never get to see.
And that is my bitch.
Due to family obligations (terminally ill parent) their lead guitarist has left the band. The guitarists handled all the vocals, so with one guy gone, they are reduced to a three-piece and are much more limited in what songs they can do live. On Friday night, they approached me about taking over on lead guitar. I'm flattered that they would ask, would love the opportunity to travel without having to tour non-stop, and could probably pick up the material fairly quickly. I probably wouldn't be in a position to jump right in and do the California/Mexico dates due to Under Eden's recording schedule, and it's more of a traditional heavy metal style that I'm not all that interested in, but I would be able to play solos the way I want and not have to do vocals.
But of course there is a negative, and even though it seems stupid, I can't get past it. I can't get "fired up" about doing all this stuff with another band when my band (playing songs that I wrote) has an EP being mixed and hopefully will have a full-length out before the end of 2008. I feel like this is the kind of stuff that MY band should be doing, even though it's not realistic with the obligations of the other members due to jobs and college. I wouldn't mind doing a couple of one-off festival dates or something, but that isn't really helping out the other band. It's not so much a matter of turning them down as it is a bit of a wake-up call that my own band isn't providing me with those opportunities.
Short version: play music that I care about but might never get to play beyond the local/regional level VS. play someone else's songs (that I don't really care much about) in places that I'd otherwise never get to see.
And that is my bitch.
Comment