To include no religion at all.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
534 women and children
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bengal View PostYou have to prove that the girls were held against their will. So far, none have said that. Statutory rape maybe, but we'll have to wait on that one. Incest? Have no proof of that either. Slavery? Seriously? What is a slave? A person held against their will? We have no proof that anyone was held against their will.
I have yet to hear a girl speak out against this cult. I know the next thing that will be said is that these girls are brainwashed, too young to make these kinds of decisions, ect. No proof of that either.
Eveyone gets caught up in the sexual nature of this story. I know I saw a lot of older women in these videos too. So one facet of this story gets everyones blood pumping.
And while I'm not a fan of yard dawg, he does have a point. If the Pope was a CEO of a string of daycares and the same shit went down, he'd be in jail. Pure and simple.
Let me ad that I have no idea what the "answer" is in this story. I'm just saying we need to let all the facts come out before damning everyone. We don't know how rampant that 50 on 14 year old sex was.
As for accusations of rape, these kids are raised in such a way that they don't realize that they SHOULD have the choice to refuse. At least that's what other FLDS refugees say. They might have to be deprogrammed for some time to look at their experience in the terms we recognize.
Slavery is a person held against their will and given no choice in the way they live. Like these kids, like the kids/grandkids of that creep in Austria who impregnated 7 kids on his daughter starting when SHE was 14.
As for the Pope, he wouldn't be arrested in any case because as the ruler of a sovereign nation, Vatican City, he has diplomatic immunity. The Catholic church is not just a religion, its head is also the ruler of a country.Ron is the MAN!!!!
Comment
-
Per Ohio Revised Code. ANY sexual conduct/contact of a victim 13 or younger is "Rape" . With or without consent. I believe this applies to age 14.
There is a 4 year window for suspects that have sexual contact/conduct with a minor ages 15-17. Depending on circumstantual elements.
This basically means is a 21 year old having consensual sex with a minor 4 years younger may be charged with Corruption of a Minor. Without consent would be "Rape"..the word "statutory" is not used during the intial arrest/crime or prosecuition in my state..
There is alot of bullshit legalities when it comes to this stuff..its a touchy situation!
In this cult..woman are breeders..as soon as they're able. You better believe they're getting passed around well before the first blade of grass has sprung on the mound.
It is a way of life for these people. These men actually cultivated a fuggin' "sex farm"..Last edited by horns666; 05-01-2008, 12:07 AM."Bill, Smoke a Bowl and Crank Van Halen I, Life is better when I do that"
Donnie Swanstrom 01/25/06..miss ya!
"Well, your friend would have Bell's Palsy, which is a facial paralysis, not "Balls Pelsy" like we're joking about here." Toejam's attempt at sensitivity.
Comment
-
"Pullin' out my pitchfork..pokin' your hay...""Bill, Smoke a Bowl and Crank Van Halen I, Life is better when I do that"
Donnie Swanstrom 01/25/06..miss ya!
"Well, your friend would have Bell's Palsy, which is a facial paralysis, not "Balls Pelsy" like we're joking about here." Toejam's attempt at sensitivity.
Comment
-
I tend to think that there was some bad stuff happening at that place. Unfortunately CPS didnt dot their i's and cross their t's. This will probably put any criminal actions into severe jeodpardy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jason1212 View PostI tend to think that there was some bad stuff happening at that place. Unfortunately CPS didnt dot their i's and cross their t's. This will probably put any criminal actions into severe jeodpardy.
http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D90QSEK00.html
CPS based there attack solely on a prank call from a nut job black woman. The judge said the state didnt offer any evidence of abuse.
"Of the 31 originally believed to be underage mothers, 15 have been reclassified as adults - one was 27 years old - and the state conceded a 14-year-old girl had no children and was not pregnant, as officials previously asserted."
The state was lying. Typical CPS crap. They didnt really investigate and came in blazing with tanks and machine guns.
"The state never provided evidence that the children were in any immediate danger, the only grounds in Texas law for taking children from their parents without court approval, the appeals court said."
Because they didnt have any evidence other than that prank call. I guess they assumed after they removed the kids they would find evidence. Ya never know. I dont doubt there was some crazy stuff going on in the compound but the state blew it in this case. Sex cult or not you have to have evidence proving it before you rush in with armored vehicles and machine guns.
Comment
Comment