Decapitation on Greyhound Bus

[Endrik]

who said everyone is going to react the same?

[Bengal]

Why do they decide who lives and who dies? You can use a gun to take someone out of the equation without killing them. A shot to the lower leg below the knee or in the foot will encapacitate anyone. There are lots of places to shoot where the injury can be small but effective. As for everyone panicking. I dont believe that, as people react in one of three macro ways depending on how their brain functions. Some will panic, some will freeze in the spot, and some will be calm. Within those three macro groups, everyone will react slightly differently in their predetermined paths. To say everyone will react the same is ridiculous. Well unless the bus was filled with French people........

Ask a cop if they shoot to wound.

That's a rediculous statement. Shoot to wound. Please. If you are that good with a pistol, you need to be a cop or in the Army.

Any cop shoots to kill, no such thing as shooting to wound.

Is shooting this guy in the knee going to stop him from hacking at the dude? I don't know for sure but I somewhat doubt it. If the main goal is to keep the person who is being attacked alive, shooting to wound will do no good at all.

That's exactly what we need. People thinking they are Annie Oakley with a gun. Sorry if I don't have the same faith in your shooting skills as you do.

Shoot to wound. HA! Laughable.

[SEEGERMANY]

"we fight like girls"

[Bengal]

The Two Coreys. Biggest piece of crap on television.

I watch it every Sunday. HA!

[SEEGERMANY]

"I would have kneecapped the motherfucker, then fucked him in the ass till he squealed like a pig"

[Bengal]

I do believe Ted focuses his latent homosexuality into a severe gun fetish.

A gun does kinda look like a cock with balls haning down, doesn't it?

I think so.

Overcompensation. It comes in many forms.

[lerxstcat]

gotta love this macho BS... people are stupid sheep... in extreme situations most panic and run for their lives... how do you know how you actually gonna act in a situation like this (not including the guys who are trained for handling that kind of things)... and folks in hysteria with guns... that's something I would be more afraid of than some psycho who is chopping up someone with a knife

Are those who would do something macho, or are those who wouldn't and resent those who would, just pussies? Food for thought....

[lerxstcat]

I do believe Ted focuses his latent homosexuality into a severe gun fetish.

A gun does kinda look like a cock with balls haning down, doesn't it?

I think so.

Overcompensation. It comes in many forms.

So you're implying that gun owners are gay, and that in turn there's something wrong with that? You realize that anti-gay slurs are frowned upon here at the JCF, don't you?

So then why are you turning gun ownership into a homophobic slur?

[Bengal]

So you're implying that gun owners are gay, and that in turn there's something wrong with that? You realize that anti-gay slurs are frowned upon here at the JCF, don't you?

So then why are you turning gun ownership into a homophobic slur?

Don't put words in my mouth.

Here's what I SAID.

"I do believe Ted focuses his latent homosexuality into a severe gun fetish.

A gun does kinda look like a cock with balls haning down, doesn't it?

I think so."

I said TED had homosexual issues. Not anyone else. If you lump yourself into that generalization, that's cool. Just don't blame me.

And what exactly was the "anti-gay slur" that I used? Please point that out to me.

[Jayster]

hey did any of you guys see that the murderer asked in court to be killed ??

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,398222,00.html

enjoy !!!

[Cleveland Metal]

Carnival worker stabbed to death, decapitated and eaten by Sedate Chinaman on a Greyhound bus in Canada...

Pretty impressive.... Sigh...

[lerxstcat]

Don't put words in my mouth.

Here's what I SAID.

"I do believe Ted focuses his latent homosexuality into a severe gun fetish.

A gun does kinda look like a cock with balls haning down, doesn't it?

I think so."

I said TED had homosexual issues. Not anyone else. If you lump yourself into that generalization, that's cool. Just don't blame me.

And what exactly was the "anti-gay slur" that I used? Please point that out to me.

It's obvious that your remarks weren't made with approval of Ted Nugent in mind, and it's also obvious that you didn't make the gay references as a compliment. Nice try at backpedaling though.

[Bengal]

It's obvious that your remarks weren't made with approval of Ted Nugent in mind, and it's also obvious that you didn't make the gay references as a compliment. Nice try at backpedaling though.

Please man. I asked you a question, you didn't answer it.

You put out there that I used an anti-gay reference. I asked where. You didn't answer it.

The approval of Ted Nugent? When do I need his approval? I don't like the guy. Tough shit.

Didn't make a gay reference as a complement? That's in the eyes of the reader. I see how you fall on the issue, you take it as an insult. I guess we knew that from the other thread though, don't we?

Backpedal? Please. If I was backpedaling or really believed I said somthing wrong, I'd edit my post.

You take issue with the fact that I said guns are somewhat phallic. That's YOUR problem friend, not mine.

[lerxstcat]

Please man. I asked you a question, you didn't answer it.

You put out there that I used an anti-gay reference. I asked where. You didn't answer it.

The approval of Ted Nugent? When do I need his approval? I don't like the guy. Tough shit.

Didn't make a gay reference as a complement? That's in the eyes of the reader. I see how you fall on the issue, you take it as an insult. I guess we knew that from the other thread though, don't we?

Backpedal? Please. If I was backpedaling or really believed I said somthing wrong, I'd edit my post.

You take issue with the fact that I said guns are somewhat phallic. That's YOUR problem friend, not mine.

I did answer that question. Nobody reading that post would interpret it otherwise than as a slur by you towards Nugent by characterizing him as gay. You trying to pretend otherwise is pretty funny though.

[Bengal]

I did answer that question. Nobody reading that post would interpret it otherwise than as a slur by you towards Nugent by characterizing him as gay. You trying to pretend otherwise is pretty funny though.

Funny that you are the only one taking "offense" to that. Why is that?

Like I said, it's what you bring to the table. You have issues so everyone else must have them.

Yep, I said he has latent homosexual issues. That is not a homophobic slur. Sorry to tell you that but it's not.

Marks caption could be considered more insulting than anything I said.

But you come after me. Why is that?

Oh yeah, I already know why. I read the other thread.