NEW AC/DC single...

[MartinBarre]

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by a third party.


Doh Stupid rules.

http://www.myspace.com/acdc

MUCH better sound quality anyway.

[Trem]

They been playin this on the radio all day, heard Brian Johnson the other day say although Back in Black is a classic ect,.. he felt this is the best album they have done, showing the capabilities of the band. To me it does sound more rich in tones and mature in vibe, whilst still sounding exactly like AC/DC, so Great!

Even if it gets tired, you can expect one thing from AC/DC, consistent Dirty ROCK & ROLL.

There have been bands that try to cop the sound feel ect,...and pretty much every one of them, while some add their own vibe ect, and might write a catchy tune ect, to me, they just sound like AC/DC ripoff bands.

Just give me the real thing, this sound, this style, they own it.

They are so great in fact, that they have somewhat been shelved into just a staple, you hear them, and you go, yeah, that's AC/DC, and people turn it up, and they rock out, and then they hope for the newest one hit wonder to come on.
They don't really get their just deserts as one of if not thee greatest Hard Rock & Roll band of all time.


fuck, where's Those about to Rock, i'm feelin it....


I'll add, i think i'd be somewhat pissed if they ever did change XD

[OnlineStageGear]

Ya know what AC/DC keeps wasting money on ????








































Rack Toms for thier drummer :ROTF:

[dimobag]

Agnus is the best! No effects just keeps things simple. Good song i love it!

[AdRock]

Ya know what AC/DC keeps wasting money on ????














Rack Toms for thier drummer :ROTF:

So true. I've had that thought many times.

[sevser]

So true. I've had that thought many times.

Hold on....Hold on...

The break down in "Shoot to Thrill" Thats what the toms are for! Best rock n roll break down ever!

[Musician78]

"All their stuff sounds the same". Well, that would be a big issue if they were shit. But since they're not shit, isn't it a good thing that they always sound much the same?
I'd rather a band is consistently brilliant but samey, than a band that wants to "expand" and turn into a steaming pile of shit.

To me they do sound like shit. Same with Kiss. Two extremely over rated bands in my opinion. I like when bands aren't afraid to experement. Lots ob bands can do this without turning to crap. Jethro Tull is a great example. Radiohead. Pink Floyd.

But when I think of bands who don't evolve even a little... AC/DC, and Nickelback are the two that instantly come to mind. And everything that I have heard from either band sounds like everything else I have heard from them. I haven't heard enough Kiss to say whether or not they evolve.... what I have heard involves the chorus being repeated over and over and over and over and over again.

[Carbuff]

To me they do sound like shit. Same with Kiss. Two extremely over rated bands in my opinion. I like when bands aren't afraid to experement. Lots ob bands can do this without turning to crap. Jethro Tull is a great example. Radiohead. Pink Floyd.

But when I think of bands who don't evolve even a little... AC/DC, and Nickelback are the two that instantly come to mind. And everything that I have heard from either band sounds like everything else I have heard from them. I haven't heard enough Kiss to say whether or not they evolve.... what I have heard involves the chorus being repeated over and over and over and over and over again.

Ya know theres always one in the crowd to piss on the parade. J/K. I know what youre sayin. But I happen to like ac/dc and anything that sounds like ac/dc. Like the first Jet cd, Get Born. It sounded a lot like ac/dc and I liked it. The second one didnt and it sucked donkey nuts. Its simple, really. AC/DC=Good Now, get with the program, Francis.

[El Chiguete]

Where to hear it?

[MartinBarre]

http://www.myspace.com/acdc

[MartinBarre]

I like when bands aren't afraid to experement. Lots ob bands can do this without turning to crap. Jethro Tull is a great example.

Well I'm sure you noted my username and avatar. Tull are my favourite band.

What I don't understand is when people say things like, "OH I like a band to change".
Why can't there be a place for both kinds of band? AC/DC type bands that stick to a formula, AND Tull like bands who sound totally different on each album?
As long as the songs are good, then why does there have to be an issue?

Again, I'll say it - if you think the songs are shit, fine, say so. To justify your dislike of the music by saying "It all sounds the same" is a worthless argument.

[sevser]

If you're going to take the "singles" AC/DC has put out....Yeah...They are quite similar...

But..."Let Me Put My Love Into You" (Wait...That looks bad...I'm talking about the song )

does not sound like any of their singles...Niether does "Spellbound" or "Overdose" How about..."Whats Next to the Moon?" "Night Prowler"

I didn't pay much attention to them after Razors Edge...

[horns666]

I got everything up to Flick of the Switch. That's all I really need. I still really like 'em..but that's where all my faves stopped.

I just have all the 70's Kiss too..I had their 80's stuff but those are all gone. That's all I need if and when I get the itch for them.

[El Chiguete]

Me like it a lot! jeje

[Musician78]

Again, I'll say it - if you think the songs are shit, fine, say so. To justify your dislike of the music by saying "It all sounds the same" is a worthless argument.

*sigh* ok.