Am I sick for thinkin she's smokin hot?!

[nhspike]

and O.J. didn't do it either, so there!

[GinSonic]

Okay. I know who she is now, but come on guys!

I know we want the whole package; Personality to go with the looks, but let's just be guys,{or girls if you lean that way!!!!}, and give the author of this thread the due respect that he deserves. Let's treat as such.

Is she smokin' hot????

Frankly, if she was a nun, who's only sins were a few profanities and masturbating when she was a tweener, she's still hot!

















and doable!!!!!
G.

[joelayres]

and O.J. didn't do it either, so there!

While it sure looks like he did - we really don't know that for a fact.
What we do know is that he took his CA jackassery act to NV and they put him in his place.

[nhspike]

Well, of course she's fuckable

[SEEGERMANY]

Even my lady friend says she's doable! No, you can't watch!

[Rich#6]

She has not been proven guilty. The facts are not all in.
While I'll agree that it does not bode well for her, she has not been convicted yet.

I'm not a court of law!

[sevser]

Funny how someone’s looks give them so much "Benefit of the doubt"...

If she was average to fugly, she would be as guilty as sin at this point...(In the publics perception, anyway)

Just like those poor homely dudes who get called "Creeper" "Stalker" when if they were a "Hottie" they would be "Charming"...I just had to deal with a situation where an attractive girls was sucking face with a "Goodlooking" guy at work...He just walked up and started hitting on her....then grabbed her hands and kissed her. She was smitten...

Yesterday a guy I know brought her flowers...She reported him as a stalker! WTF??? I don't even like the guy and still I feel for him.

Its all about the looks...

[shobet]

I'd do them both!


Look she's just asking to give a gobble.

[joelayres]

I'm not a court of law!

And hopefully, you never get to serve on a jury.
Not in any way saying you are a bad person, but if you are quick to convict based on anything but the facts as presented in a court of law - not what you "think" happened, but what the state can "prove" - you should not serve on a jury.

Speaking for myself, I could live with myself a lot easier if I found out that I had acquitted a guilty person based on circumstantial evidence than I could if I had sent an innocent person to jail based on that same evidence. I want the scumbags to go away as much as anyone, but not at the expense of ANY innocent people.

[SEEGERMANY]

"no officer, I'm reducing the water pressure in my tires"

[shreddermon]

That sick c**t never called the authorities to report her three year old child missing. It was the kid's grandmother who did. From an MSNBC article...

"Caylee's grandmother first called authorities in July to say she hadn't seen the girl, whose third birthday passed shortly after her disappearance, for a month. Her daughter's car smelled like death, she said."

She was missing for a month, and mom never notified the authorities? Guilty. Lock her up. Throw away the key.

[åron]

Glad as fuck I don't follow the media circus or work with any people that care or talk about this sort of CRAP. Is she hot? She's pretty, kinda average but with the right personality and voice I'd sink it, you bet!

[joelayres]

Looks like the twins are hangin' a bit south on this one - but I'd still hit it ...

[Mr.C]

she may be cute doable whatever, but anyone who would harm a child should not be allowed to breathe, granted she has not been convicted in a court of law YET but her actions sealed her fate long ago..

such a tragedy what a beautiful child Caylee was

[åron]

She was missing for a month, and mom never notified the authorities? Guilty. Lock her up. Throw away the key.

That makes her guilty of other crimes, but not necessarily murder. Depending on the lawyers and the jurors though, yes she could be in for a stay in the clink.