Wow,
I'm going to address Marcus's question here, BigD you're not coming across very well in this thread ~ if your only intent is to antagonize people who have different beliefs then you are doing a good job!
In an effort to save time(I'm at work again), I'm going to plagarize some text here(over the weekend I'll address any other questions pertaining to this thought process and the deeper implications of it as applied to scientific theory) ;
Did you know that clocks tick progressively faster as you gain elevation? It's true, because time speeds up the farther you get from gravitational masses, such as the mass of the Earth, so carried to the extreme, during the six days of creation, when the beginning point of created matter expanded rapidly outward(as outlined in the big bang theory), that matter began to coalesce as stars, sending out light, but because those stars are hundreds of millions of miles away, does that necessarily mean that the light from them took billions of years to get here, and therefore those stars must be billions of years old?
Big bang theorists say that matter is is essentially homogenous throughout the universe, what they say is boundless, but with the beginning point for the big bang therefore necessitating an outer reach after its expansion, to an extent still unobservable to humans, it therefore must be a bounded universe, whos rapid expansion outward allowed gravitational time dilation ......
End of plagarism ~
If needed I'll be happy this weekend to explain the points I agree with and where I also have some issues with this theorem, however in a base manner this explains how the Earth could be both new and old!
As far as the bashing angle I've seen in here, it's dis-heartining!
Cheers
I'm going to address Marcus's question here, BigD you're not coming across very well in this thread ~ if your only intent is to antagonize people who have different beliefs then you are doing a good job!
In an effort to save time(I'm at work again), I'm going to plagarize some text here(over the weekend I'll address any other questions pertaining to this thought process and the deeper implications of it as applied to scientific theory) ;
Did you know that clocks tick progressively faster as you gain elevation? It's true, because time speeds up the farther you get from gravitational masses, such as the mass of the Earth, so carried to the extreme, during the six days of creation, when the beginning point of created matter expanded rapidly outward(as outlined in the big bang theory), that matter began to coalesce as stars, sending out light, but because those stars are hundreds of millions of miles away, does that necessarily mean that the light from them took billions of years to get here, and therefore those stars must be billions of years old?
Big bang theorists say that matter is is essentially homogenous throughout the universe, what they say is boundless, but with the beginning point for the big bang therefore necessitating an outer reach after its expansion, to an extent still unobservable to humans, it therefore must be a bounded universe, whos rapid expansion outward allowed gravitational time dilation ......
End of plagarism ~
If needed I'll be happy this weekend to explain the points I agree with and where I also have some issues with this theorem, however in a base manner this explains how the Earth could be both new and old!
As far as the bashing angle I've seen in here, it's dis-heartining!
Cheers
Comment